• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

倾向得分法在治疗组与非随机对照组比较中减少偏倚的应用

Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group.

作者信息

D'Agostino R B

机构信息

Department of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157-1063, USA.

出版信息

Stat Med. 1998 Oct 15;17(19):2265-81. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19981015)17:19<2265::aid-sim918>3.0.co;2-b.

DOI:10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19981015)17:19<2265::aid-sim918>3.0.co;2-b
PMID:9802183
Abstract

In observational studies, investigators have no control over the treatment assignment. The treated and non-treated (that is, control) groups may have large differences on their observed covariates, and these differences can lead to biased estimates of treatment effects. Even traditional covariance analysis adjustments may be inadequate to eliminate this bias. The propensity score, defined as the conditional probability of being treated given the covariates, can be used to balance the covariates in the two groups, and therefore reduce this bias. In order to estimate the propensity score, one must model the distribution of the treatment indicator variable given the observed covariates. Once estimated the propensity score can be used to reduce bias through matching, stratification (subclassification), regression adjustment, or some combination of all three. In this tutorial we discuss the uses of propensity score methods for bias reduction, give references to the literature and illustrate the uses through applied examples.

摘要

在观察性研究中,研究者无法控制治疗分配。接受治疗组和未接受治疗组(即对照组)在观察到的协变量上可能存在很大差异,而这些差异可能导致治疗效果的估计出现偏差。即使是传统的协方差分析调整也可能不足以消除这种偏差。倾向得分定义为给定协变量时接受治疗的条件概率,可用于平衡两组中的协变量,从而减少这种偏差。为了估计倾向得分,必须对给定观察到的协变量时治疗指标变量的分布进行建模。一旦估计出倾向得分,就可以通过匹配、分层(亚分类)、回归调整或这三种方法的某种组合来减少偏差。在本教程中,我们讨论倾向得分方法在减少偏差方面的用途,提供文献参考,并通过应用示例说明其用途。

相似文献

1
Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group.倾向得分法在治疗组与非随机对照组比较中减少偏倚的应用
Stat Med. 1998 Oct 15;17(19):2265-81. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19981015)17:19<2265::aid-sim918>3.0.co;2-b.
2
[Unbiased estimation of factorial effect by using analysis of covariance or propensity score method for observational studies in laboratory medicine].[在检验医学观察性研究中使用协方差分析或倾向得分法对析因效应进行无偏估计]
Rinsho Byori. 2012 Jul;60(7):689-97.
3
Estimating effects of nursing intervention via propensity score analysis.通过倾向得分分析评估护理干预的效果。
Nurs Res. 2008 Nov-Dec;57(6):444-52. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0b013e31818c66f6.
4
Prognostic models and the propensity score.预后模型与倾向评分
Int J Epidemiol. 1995 Feb;24(1):183-7. doi: 10.1093/ije/24.1.183.
5
A comparison of the ability of different propensity score models to balance measured variables between treated and untreated subjects: a Monte Carlo study.不同倾向得分模型平衡治疗组和未治疗组受试者间测量变量能力的比较:一项蒙特卡洛研究
Stat Med. 2007 Feb 20;26(4):734-53. doi: 10.1002/sim.2580.
6
Goodness-of-fit diagnostics for the propensity score model when estimating treatment effects using covariate adjustment with the propensity score.在使用倾向得分进行协变量调整来估计治疗效果时,倾向得分模型的拟合优度诊断。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 Dec;17(12):1202-17. doi: 10.1002/pds.1673.
7
An evaluation of bias in propensity score-adjusted non-linear regression models.倾向得分调整后的非线性回归模型中的偏倚评估。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Mar;27(3):846-862. doi: 10.1177/0962280216643739. Epub 2016 Apr 19.
8
Invited commentary: propensity scores.特邀评论:倾向评分
Am J Epidemiol. 1999 Aug 15;150(4):327-33. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a010011.
9
Too much ado about propensity score models? Comparing methods of propensity score matching.对倾向得分模型是否小题大做?比较倾向得分匹配方法。
Value Health. 2006 Nov-Dec;9(6):377-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2006.00130.x.
10
Assessing balance in measured baseline covariates when using many-to-one matching on the propensity-score.在倾向得分进行多对一匹配时评估测量的基线协变量中的平衡。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2008 Dec;17(12):1218-25. doi: 10.1002/pds.1674.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of prior solid tumors and their treatment modality on outcomes after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.既往实体瘤及其治疗方式对异基因造血干细胞移植后结局的影响。
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2025 Sep 15. doi: 10.1038/s41409-025-02718-8.
2
An Evaluation of the Pathways Community HUB Approach To Improving Birth Outcomes: A Retrospective Study Using Propensity Score Matching in Richland, Ohio.评估路径社区中心改善分娩结局的方法:一项在俄亥俄州里奇兰使用倾向得分匹配的回顾性研究。
Matern Child Health J. 2025 Sep 11. doi: 10.1007/s10995-025-04172-w.
3
Alternative Surveillance Improves Outcomes by Detecting Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients.
替代性监测通过检测慢性乙型肝炎患者的早期肝细胞癌改善预后。
Gut Liver. 2025 Sep 15;19(5):770-780. doi: 10.5009/gnl240602. Epub 2025 Sep 5.
4
Comparison of early and intermediate-term outcomes between hybrid arch debranching and total arch replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis of propensity-matched studies.杂交主动脉弓去分支术与全主动脉弓置换术的早期和中期结果比较:倾向匹配研究的系统评价和荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 4;20(9):e0314341. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314341. eCollection 2025.
5
Calibrated and Conformal Propensity Scores for Causal Effect Estimation.用于因果效应估计的校准共形倾向得分
Uncertain Artif Intell. 2024 Jul;2024:1083-1111. Epub 2024 Jul 15.
6
Reduced Muscle Loss in Patients With NSCLC Taking Fibrates: Findings From a Retrospective Observational Study.非小细胞肺癌患者服用贝特类药物后肌肉损失减少:一项回顾性观察研究的结果
J Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle. 2025 Aug;16(4):e70016. doi: 10.1002/jcsm.70016.
7
Long-term efficacy and short-term outcomes of intersphincteric resection abdominoperineal resection in patients with ultra-low rectal cancer.超低位直肠癌患者行括约肌间切除术与腹会阴联合切除术的长期疗效及短期结局
World J Gastroenterol. 2025 Aug 7;31(29):110004. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i29.110004.
8
Minimizing Blood Loss in Bladder Cancer: Efficacy of Preoperative Embolization before Transurethral Resection of Bladder Tumor.减少膀胱癌术中失血:经尿道膀胱肿瘤切除术前栓塞治疗的疗效
J Korean Soc Radiol. 2025 Jul;86(4):512-523. doi: 10.3348/jksr.2024.0148. Epub 2025 Jul 25.
9
Increased risk of osteoarthritis in persons with spinal cord injury: a population-based longitudinal follow-up study in Taiwan.脊髓损伤患者患骨关节炎风险增加:台湾一项基于人群的纵向随访研究
Spinal Cord. 2025 Aug 9. doi: 10.1038/s41393-025-01112-x.
10
Overtreatment in colorectal cancer prevention: comparison between surgical and endoscopic treatment of benign colonic polyps.结直肠癌预防中的过度治疗:良性结肠息肉手术治疗与内镜治疗的比较
Therap Adv Gastroenterol. 2025 Aug 5;18:17562848251351214. doi: 10.1177/17562848251351214. eCollection 2025.