Ilias Ioannis, Stamoulis Konstantinos, Armaganidis Apostolos, Lyberopoulos Panagiotis, Tzanela Marinella, Orfanos Stylianos, Theodorakopoulou Maria, Tsagarakis Stylianos, Dimopoulou Ioanna
Department of Endocrinology, Elena Venizelou Hospital, and Athens University School of Medicine, Greece.
Hormones (Athens). 2007 Jul-Sep;6(3):218-26.
To evaluate whether tentative prognostic models for intensive care unit survival of multiple trauma patients could be improved by including endocrine parameters.
Prospective study.
Eighty-three male and 11 female multiple trauma patients.
Upon admission, severity of trauma was assessed with the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and the Injury Severity Score (IS). Concurrently, blood was drawn to measure thyrotropin (TSH), free thyroxine (fT4), trioodothyronine (T3), corticotropin (ACTH), prolactin (PRL), cortisol and dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEAS). Adrenal reserve was assessed with the Synacthen test.
Seventy-five of the 83 men and 8 of the 11 women survived. APACHE II and SOFA scores were higher in non-survivors compared to survivors (with considerable overlap). From the baseline endocrine work-up, survivors had higher ACTH and DHEAS values compared to non-survivors (also with considerable overlap). No differences between survivors and non-survivors were noted in the Synacthen test or in thyroid function tests. Nevertheless, a multivariate logistic regression model that incorporated the APACHE II score and hormonal parameters (Cortisol post-Synacthen, DHEAS, TSH*age) was well-fitted to assess survival/non-survival as an endpoint and better than APACHE II, SOFA or IS scores alone to predict ICU survival or death.
In critically ill multiple trauma patients, age, TSH, Cortisol post-Synacthen and DHEAS values upon admission to the ICU, combined with the APACHE II score, may predict outcome more accurately than the APACHE II score alone.an the APACHe II score alone.
评估纳入内分泌参数是否能改进多发伤患者重症监护病房生存情况的初步预后模型。
前瞻性研究。
83例男性和11例女性多发伤患者。
入院时,采用急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)、序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分和损伤严重程度评分(IS)评估创伤严重程度。同时,采集血液检测促甲状腺激素(TSH)、游离甲状腺素(fT4)、三碘甲状腺原氨酸(T3)、促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)、催乳素(PRL)、皮质醇和硫酸脱氢表雄酮(DHEAS)。采用促肾上腺皮质激素刺激试验评估肾上腺储备功能。
83例男性中有75例存活,11例女性中有8例存活。与存活者相比,非存活者的APACHE II和SOFA评分更高(有相当程度的重叠)。从基线内分泌检查来看,与非存活者相比,存活者的ACTH和DHEAS值更高(也有相当程度的重叠)。在促肾上腺皮质激素刺激试验或甲状腺功能检查中,存活者与非存活者之间未发现差异。然而,一个纳入APACHE II评分和激素参数(促肾上腺皮质激素刺激试验后的皮质醇、DHEAS、TSH*年龄)的多因素逻辑回归模型非常适合将生存/非生存作为终点进行评估,并且比单独的APACHE II、SOFA或IS评分更能准确预测重症监护病房的生存或死亡。
在危重症多发伤患者中,年龄、入住重症监护病房时的TSH、促肾上腺皮质激素刺激试验后的皮质醇和DHEAS值,结合APACHE II评分,可能比单独的APACHE II评分更准确地预测预后。