Hickey Kathryn
Shriners Hospitals for Children-Chicago, 2211 N. Oak Park Avenue, Chicago, IL 60707, USA.
JONAS Healthc Law Ethics Regul. 2007 Jul-Sep;9(3):100-4; quiz 105-6. doi: 10.1097/01.NHL.0000287968.36429.a9.
In the past, minors were not considered legally capable of making medical decisions and were viewed as incompetent because of their age. The authority to consent or refuse treatment for a minor remained with a parent or guardian. This parental authority was derived from the constitutional right to privacy regarding family matters, common law rule, and a general presumption that parents or guardians will act in the best interest of their incompetent child. However, over the years, the courts have gradually recognized that children younger than 18 years who show maturity and competence deserve a voice in determining their course of medical treatment. This article will explore the rights and interests of minors, parents, and the state in medical decision making and will address implications for nursing administrators and leaders.
过去,未成年人在法律上不被认为有能力做出医疗决策,因其年龄而被视为无行为能力。为未成年人同意或拒绝治疗的权力仍归父母或监护人所有。这种父母的权力源自家庭事务方面宪法赋予的隐私权、普通法规则,以及父母或监护人会为其无行为能力的孩子做出最佳利益决策的一般推定。然而,多年来,法院逐渐认识到,表现出成熟和行为能力的18岁以下儿童在决定其医疗过程中应有发言权。本文将探讨未成年人、父母和国家在医疗决策中的权利和利益,并将阐述对护理管理人员和领导者的影响。