Kelly T H, Fischman M W, Foltin R W, Brady J V
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21205.
J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Nov;56(3):557-74. doi: 10.1901/jeab.1991.56-557.
The effects of temporal delays imposed between successive responses and of vitamin C administration were examined on the acquisition of response sequences and on cardiovascular reactivity during sequence acquisition. Thirteen adult subjects (6 female, 7 male), in good health, gave written consent prior to participating in 12 weekly 45-min sessions. Points, exchanged for money after each session, were presented when subjects completed 15-response sequences on a touch-sensitive three-response keypad. A position counter increased from 0 to 14 as subjects emitted correct responses in the sequence. Four novel 15-response sequences were presented each session. No delays were imposed between successive responses during the acquisition of one sequence; delays were imposed immediately following each response during the acquisition of a second sequence, thereby delaying response feedback; delays were imposed following feedback during acquisition of a third sequence, resulting in the removal of the stimulus correlated with sequence position; and, as a control condition, delays were imposed following feedback, but stimuli correlated with sequence position were reinstated prior to the next response during acquisition of a fourth sequence. Subjects were exposed to one of two delay durations (0.2 and 0.5 or 0.5 and 1.0 s) each session, and delay durations alternated every session. During Weeks 5 to 8, subjects received 3 grams of vitamin C per day, whereas during Weeks 1 to 4 and 9 to 12, subjects received placebo under single-blind conditions. All subjects acquired the sequences, as evidenced by decreasing percentages of incorrect responses across trials. When temporal delays were imposed between successive responses during sequence acquisition, acquisition efficiency was enhanced. Examination of response latencies suggested that the status of preceding responses (i.e., correct or incorrect) rather than the status of the position counter influenced subsequent responding. Cardiovascular effects were inversely related to the length of the temporal delay. Neither cardiovascular reactivity or sequence acquisition were related to vitamin C administration.
研究了连续反应之间施加的时间延迟以及维生素C给药对反应序列习得和序列习得过程中心血管反应性的影响。13名健康成年受试者(6名女性,7名男性)在参加每周12次、每次45分钟的实验前签署了书面同意书。每次实验结束后可兑换金钱的积分,在受试者通过触摸感应三键键盘完成15次反应序列时呈现。当受试者按顺序发出正确反应时,位置计数器从0增加到14。每次实验呈现四个新的15次反应序列。在一个序列的习得过程中,连续反应之间不施加延迟;在第二个序列的习得过程中,每次反应后立即施加延迟,从而延迟反应反馈;在第三个序列的习得过程中,在反馈后施加延迟,导致与序列位置相关的刺激被移除;并且,作为对照条件,在第四个序列的习得过程中,在反馈后施加延迟,但在下一次反应前恢复与序列位置相关的刺激。每次实验受试者接触两种延迟时长之一(0.2秒和0.5秒或0.5秒和1.0秒),延迟时长每次实验交替。在第5至8周,受试者每天服用3克维生素C,而在第1至4周和第9至12周,受试者在单盲条件下服用安慰剂。所有受试者都习得了序列,这从各次试验中错误反应百分比的下降可以看出。当在序列习得过程中连续反应之间施加时间延迟时,习得效率提高。对反应潜伏期的检查表明,先前反应的状态(即正确或错误)而非位置计数器的状态影响后续反应。心血管效应与时间延迟的长度呈负相关。心血管反应性或序列习得均与维生素C给药无关。