Miller J
Department of Psychology, UCSD, La Jolla 92093.
Q J Exp Psychol A. 1991 Nov;43(4):907-12. doi: 10.1080/14640749108400962.
To remove the influence of spuriously long response times, many investigators compute "restricted means", obtained by throwing out any response time more than 2.0, 2.5, or 3.0 standard deviations from the overall sample average. Because reaction time distributions are skewed, however, the computation of restricted means introduces a bias: the restricted mean underestimates the true average of the population of response times. This problem may be very serious when investigators compare restricted means across conditions with different numbers of observations, because the bias increases with sample size. Simulations show that there is substantial differential bias when comparing conditions with fewer than 10 observations against conditions with more than 20. With strongly skewed distributions and a cutoff of 3.0 standard deviations, differential bias can influence comparisons of conditions with even more observations.
为消除虚假长反应时间的影响,许多研究者计算“受限均值”,方法是剔除任何与总体样本均值相差超过2.0、2.5或3.0个标准差的反应时间。然而,由于反应时间分布是偏态的,受限均值的计算会引入偏差:受限均值低估了反应时间总体的真实平均值。当研究者比较不同观测数量条件下的受限均值时,这个问题可能会非常严重,因为偏差会随着样本量的增加而增大。模拟结果表明,当比较观测数少于10的条件与观测数多于20的条件时,存在显著的差异偏差。对于强烈偏态分布且截断值为3.0个标准差的情况,差异偏差甚至会影响更多观测数条件之间的比较。