Park Douglas L, Whitaker Thomas B, Simonson Janet, Morris Hershel F, Durr Bobby, Njapau Henry
Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Department of Food Science, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.
J AOAC Int. 2007 Jul-Aug;90(4):1036-41.
The number of elevator facilities with laboratories to test shelled corn for aflatoxin on site is increasing. The inherent difficulty in accurately determining the true aflatoxin concentration of a lot of corn may have serious implications. Deviations from the true value are of even greater significance at busy locations where a high throughput is desired. This study was instituted to measure (1) the differences in aflatoxin test results between elevator laboratories and the Louisiana Agricultural Chemistry (LAC) laboratory and (2) the variability in aflatoxin test results associated with sampling, sample preparation, and analysis of shelled corn at such locations. One hundred lots of shelled corn from 10 elevators in Louisiana were analyzed for aflatoxin using the Aflatest method (at elevators and at the LAC laboratory) and high-performance column liquid chromatography (HPLC; LAC laboratory only). Mean aflatoxin levels determined at elevator laboratories were significantly (P < 0.05) lower from those obtained in the LAC laboratory using the Aflatest method. Overall, Aflatest method results were lower than those obtained by HPLC. This difference may be attributed to analyst technical dexterity, difficulty in providing careful attention to detail in a high throughput environment, and/or substandard facilities found at elevators. The total variance was partitioned into the combined sampling plus subsampling variance and analytical variance. The sampling and sample preparation steps accounted for about 91.5% of the total variability. When using the HPLC analytical method, the analytical step contributed only 8.5% to the total variance.
配备有现场检测带壳玉米黄曲霉毒素实验室的粮库设施数量正在增加。准确测定一批玉米中黄曲霉毒素真实浓度存在的固有困难可能会产生严重影响。在期望高吞吐量的繁忙场所,与真实值的偏差具有更大的意义。开展本研究的目的是测定:(1)粮库实验室与路易斯安那州农业化学(LAC)实验室之间黄曲霉毒素检测结果的差异;(2)在此类场所对带壳玉米进行采样、样品制备和分析时,黄曲霉毒素检测结果的变异性。使用Aflatest方法(在粮库和LAC实验室)和高效柱液相色谱法(仅在LAC实验室)对来自路易斯安那州10个粮库的100批带壳玉米进行黄曲霉毒素分析。粮库实验室测定的黄曲霉毒素平均水平显著低于(P < 0.05)使用Aflatest方法在LAC实验室获得的结果。总体而言,Aflatest方法的结果低于高效液相色谱法获得的结果。这种差异可能归因于分析人员的技术熟练程度、在高吞吐量环境中难以仔细关注细节以及/或者粮库发现的不合标准的设施。总方差被划分为组合采样加二次采样方差和分析方差。采样和样品制备步骤占总变异性的约91.5%。当使用高效液相色谱分析方法时,分析步骤对总方差的贡献仅为8.5%。