White Patrick, Wong Wun, Fleming Tracey, Gray Barry
King's College London Medical School, Department of General Practice and Primary Care, London.
Br J Gen Pract. 2007 Sep;57(542):701-5.
Provision of spirometry for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a new requirement in primary care. Effective spirometry requires that tests and interpretations meet international criteria.
To assess the feasibility and usefulness of remote specialist reporting of primary care spirometry.
Comparison of reporting by primary care clinicians and respiratory specialists of consecutive primary care spirometry tests.
South London primary care teams with patient lists > or =6000.
Feasibility of remote reporting of spirometry was assessed by the frequency of electronic mailing of tests. Usefulness of remote reporting was defined by the frequency that specialist reports made a clinically significant addition. Usefulness was assessed by measuring agreement (kappa) between primary care reports and those of specialists. Clinically significant disagreements were analysed with respect to test quality, diagnosis, and severity.
Six practices emailed 312 tests over 3 months. Forty-nine tests sent without indices or curves (flow volume and time volume) were excluded. Mean age of patients tested was 65 years and 52% were female. Mean predicted forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) was 69%. Clinically significant disagreements were identified in the interpretation of acceptability (quality) of 67/212 (32%) tests (kappa = 0.07; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0 to 0.24), of diagnosis in 49/168 (29%) tests (kappa = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.25 to 0.55), and of severity in 62/191 (32%) tests (kappa = 0.53; 95% CI = 0.43 to 0.63).
Remote reporting of primary care spirometry was feasible. Its usefulness was confirmed by the high rate of additional clinically significant information to the reports of primary care clinicians. The quality of primary care spirometry was so unsatisfactory that remote reporting of tests may be a means of establishing adequate spirometry.
在基层医疗中提供慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的肺功能测定是一项新要求。有效的肺功能测定要求测试和解读符合国际标准。
评估基层医疗肺功能测定远程专家报告的可行性和实用性。
对基层医疗临床医生和呼吸专科医生对连续基层医疗肺功能测定测试的报告进行比较。
患者名单≥6000的伦敦南部基层医疗团队。
通过测试电子邮件发送频率评估肺功能测定远程报告的可行性。远程报告的实用性通过专家报告提供具有临床意义补充信息的频率来定义。通过测量基层医疗报告与专家报告之间的一致性(kappa值)来评估实用性。对具有临床意义的分歧在测试质量、诊断和严重程度方面进行分析。
6家医疗机构在3个月内通过电子邮件发送了312次测试。排除49次未附带指标或曲线(流量容积和时间容积)的测试。接受测试患者的平均年龄为65岁,52%为女性。第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)的平均预测值为69%。在67/212(32%)次测试的可接受性(质量)解读中发现具有临床意义的分歧(kappa = 0.07;95%置信区间[CI] = 0至0.24),在49/168(29%)次测试的诊断中发现分歧(kappa = 0.39;95% CI = 0.25至0.55),在62/191(32%)次测试的严重程度评估中发现分歧(kappa = 0.53;95% CI = 0.43至0.63)。
基层医疗肺功能测定的远程报告是可行的。基层医疗临床医生报告中大量具有临床意义的补充信息证实了其实用性。基层医疗肺功能测定的质量如此不尽人意,以至于测试的远程报告可能是建立充分肺功能测定的一种手段。