Suppr超能文献

两种不同方案对先天性马蹄内翻足进行保守治疗的比较结果。

Comparative results of the conservative treatment in clubfoot by two different protocols.

作者信息

Cosma Dan, Vasilescu Dana, Vasilescu Dan, Valeanu Madalina

机构信息

Department of aPediatric Surgery, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.

出版信息

J Pediatr Orthop B. 2007 Sep;16(5):317-21. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0b013e32826d18a6.

Abstract

The current study aims at presenting the results of the two methods of conservative treatment in clubfoot: the Romanian traditional method and the Ponseti method. The study population included 103 children (148 clubfeet) treated in our department between 1998 and 2005. Between 1998 and 2003, the conservative treatment protocol was based upon the Romanian method. The Ponseti method has been used since 2004. The main criterion for the assessment of the efficiency of the two conservative methods in clubfoot is the number of feet requiring surgical treatment - posteromedial release at 18 months. This criterion is clearly in favor of the Ponseti method: four feet (5%) needed posteromedial release in Ponseti group patients versus 13 feet (18%) in Romanian group patients (P=0.0193). The Ponseti method is safe, efficient in the conservative treatment of clubfoot and decreases the number of surgical interventions needed for the correction of the deformation compared with our traditional method.

摘要

本研究旨在呈现马蹄内翻足两种保守治疗方法的结果

罗马尼亚传统方法和庞塞蒂方法。研究对象包括1998年至2005年间在我们科室接受治疗的103名儿童(148只马蹄内翻足)。1998年至2003年期间,保守治疗方案基于罗马尼亚方法。自2004年起使用庞塞蒂方法。评估马蹄内翻足两种保守方法疗效的主要标准是需要手术治疗的足部数量——18个月时进行后内侧松解。这一标准明显有利于庞塞蒂方法:庞塞蒂组患者中有4只脚(5%)需要后内侧松解,而罗马尼亚组患者中有13只脚(18%)需要后内侧松解(P = 0.0193)。与我们的传统方法相比,庞塞蒂方法在马蹄内翻足的保守治疗中安全、有效,且减少了矫正畸形所需的手术干预次数。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验