Lazaraki G, Kountouras J, Metallidis S, Dokas S, Bakaloudis T, Chatzopoulos D, Gavalas E, Zavos C
Department of Medicine, Second Medical Clinic, Ippokration Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Surg Endosc. 2007 Sep;21(9):1631-6. doi: 10.1007/s00464-007-9215-y. Epub 2007 Feb 16.
Colonoscopy remains an uncomfortable examination and many patients prefer to be sedated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous administration of fentanyl in titrated doses compared with intravenous administration of the well-known midazolam in titrated doses.
One hundred twenty-six patients scheduled for ambulatory colonoscopy were randomly assigned to receive either 25 mcg fentanyl (Fentanyl group, n = 66, 35 females, mean age = 61.5 years) and titrated up to 50 mcg or 2 mg midazolam (Midazolam group, n = 60, 33 females, mean age = 63.2 years) and titrated up to 5 mg. Patients graded discomfort on a scale from 0 to 4 and pain on a scale from 0 to 10. Success of the procedure, time to cecum, complications, and recovery time for each patient were independently recorded.
Mean discomfort scores were 0.4 in the Fentanyl group and 1.0 in the Midazolam group (p = 0.002). Similarly, mean scores for pain and anus to cecum time were lower in the Fentanyl group than in the Midazolam group [2.59 vs. 4.43 (p = 0.002) and 8.7 vs. 12.9 min (p = 0.012), respectively]. No adverse events were reported in the Fentanyl group, while in the Midazolam group a decrease in oxygen saturation was noted in 23/60 (35%) patients. Mean recovery time was 5.6 min in the Fentanyl group and 16 min in the Midazolam group (p = 0.014). Mean dosage was 36 mcg for fentanyl and 4.6 mg for midazolam.
Administration of fentanyl in low incremental doses is sufficient to achieve a satisfactory level of comfort during colonoscopy.
结肠镜检查仍然是一种令人不适的检查,许多患者希望接受镇静。本研究的目的是评估静脉注射滴定剂量的芬太尼与静脉注射滴定剂量的知名药物咪达唑仑相比的疗效和安全性。
126例计划进行门诊结肠镜检查的患者被随机分配接受25微克芬太尼(芬太尼组,n = 66,35名女性,平均年龄 = 61.5岁)并滴定至50微克,或2毫克咪达唑仑(咪达唑仑组,n = 60,33名女性,平均年龄 = 63.2岁)并滴定至5毫克。患者对不适程度按0至4级评分,疼痛按0至10级评分。独立记录每位患者的操作成功率、到达盲肠的时间、并发症和恢复时间。
芬太尼组的平均不适评分为0.4,咪达唑仑组为1.0(p = 0.002)。同样,芬太尼组的疼痛平均评分和肛门至盲肠时间低于咪达唑仑组[分别为2.59对4.43(p = 0.002)和8.7对12.9分钟(p = 0.012)]。芬太尼组未报告不良事件,而咪达唑仑组有23/60(35%)的患者出现氧饱和度下降。芬太尼组的平均恢复时间为5.6分钟,咪达唑仑组为16分钟(p = 0.014)。芬太尼的平均剂量为36微克,咪达唑仑为4.6毫克。
低剂量递增注射芬太尼足以在结肠镜检查期间达到令人满意的舒适水平。