Department of Anesthesiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1100 DD, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Tech Coloproctol. 2012 Aug;16(4):271-6. doi: 10.1007/s10151-012-0834-5. Epub 2012 Jun 6.
Colonoscopy is a proven method for bowel cancer screening and is often experienced as a painful procedure. Today, there are two main strategies to facilitate colonoscopy. First, deep sedation results in satisfied patients but increases sedation-associated risks and raises costs for healthcare providers. Second, there is the advocacy for colonoscopies without any form of sedation. This might be an option for a special group of patients, but does not hold true for everybody. Following Moerman's hypothesis: "If pain is the crucial point, why do we need sedation?" this review shows the analgesic options for a painless procedure, increasing success rates without increasing risk of sedation. There are two agents, with the potential to be a nearly ideal analgesic agent for colonoscopy: alfentanil and nitrous oxide (N(2)O). Administration of either substance causes the patient to be comfortable yet alert and facilitates a short turnover. Advantages of these drugs include rapid onset and offset of action, analgesic and anxiolytic effects, ease of titration to desired level, rapid recovery, and an excellent safety profile.
结肠镜检查是一种经过验证的结直肠癌筛查方法,但常常被患者体验为痛苦的过程。目前,有两种主要策略可以促进结肠镜检查。首先,深度镇静可以使患者满意,但会增加与镇静相关的风险,并增加医疗保健提供者的成本。其次,有人提倡在不使用任何镇静形式的情况下进行结肠镜检查。这可能是特殊患者群体的一个选择,但并非适用于所有人。基于 Moerman 的假设:“如果疼痛是关键,我们为什么需要镇静?”,本综述展示了无痛操作的镇痛选择,在不增加镇静风险的情况下提高成功率。有两种药物有可能成为结肠镜检查的近乎理想的镇痛剂:阿芬太尼和一氧化二氮(N2O)。给予这两种物质可使患者感到舒适但保持清醒,并促进快速周转。这些药物的优点包括作用迅速起效和消退、镇痛和抗焦虑作用、易于滴定至所需水平、快速恢复和极好的安全性。