Schoepfer Alain M, Trummler Michael, Seeholzer Petra, Criblez Dominique H, Seibold Frank
Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital/Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland.
Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Oct;50(10):1697-706. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-0303-9.
This study was designed to evaluate the accuracy of four different fecal markers in discriminating between irritable bowel syndrome, inflammatory bowel disease, and other forms of colitis and to examine the feasibility of collecting fecal samples in outpatients.
We prospectively included 20 patients with irritable bowel syndrome, 36 with inflammatory bowel disease (24 Crohn's disease, 12 ulcerative colitis), and 18 with other forms of colitis (8 infectious colitis, 5 ischemic colitis, 5 medication-induced colitis). Diagnosis was established by clinical, laboratory, and endoscopic workup. Blinded fecal samples were measured for calprotectin (PhiCal-Test, ELISA), lactoferrin (IBD-SCAN, ELISA), Hexagon OBTI (immunochromatographic test for detection of human hemoglobin), and LEUKO-TEST (lactoferrin latex-agglutination test).
Overall accuracy for discriminating irritable bowel syndrome from inflammatory bowel disease or other forms of colitis was recorded, respectively: IBD-SCAN 91/100 percent, PhiCal-Test 89/100 percent, LEUKO-TEST 83/89 percent, Hexagon OBTI 77/84 percent, C-reactive protein 71/79 percent, and blood leukocytes 63/68 percent. Differentiation of inflammatory bowel disease from other forms of colitis with fecal markers was as follows: range of overall accuracy from 43 to 50 percent. Overall accuracy (in percent) for discrimination of irritable bowel syndrome from patients with Crohn's disease in remission (CDAI<150) was: IBD-SCAN 90, PhiCal-Test 90, LEUKO-TEST 85, Hexagon OBTI 77. Calprotectin and lactoferrin were significantly elevated in patients with Crohn's disease with CDAI>150 compared with those in remission. Fecal sampling feasibility in outpatients was high (acceptance rate 95 percent).
IBD-SCAN and PhiCal-Test have the best overall accuracy for detection of colitis, followed by LEUKO-TEST, Hexagon OBTI, C-reactive protein, and blood leukocytes. Accuracy of fecal markers is high even in patients with Crohn's disease in remission. Fecal sampling feasibility was high in outpatients. Because fecal markers are unspecific, endoscopic workup remains crucial to determine the underlying cause of colitis.
本研究旨在评估四种不同粪便标志物在区分肠易激综合征、炎症性肠病和其他形式结肠炎方面的准确性,并检验在门诊患者中采集粪便样本的可行性。
我们前瞻性纳入了20例肠易激综合征患者、36例炎症性肠病患者(24例克罗恩病、12例溃疡性结肠炎)和18例其他形式结肠炎患者(8例感染性结肠炎、5例缺血性结肠炎、5例药物性结肠炎)。通过临床、实验室和内镜检查进行诊断。对盲法采集的粪便样本检测钙卫蛋白(PhiCal检测,酶联免疫吸附测定)、乳铁蛋白(IBD-SCAN,酶联免疫吸附测定)、Hexagon OBTI(检测人血红蛋白的免疫层析试验)和LEUKO-TEST(乳铁蛋白乳胶凝集试验)。
记录了区分肠易激综合征与炎症性肠病或其他形式结肠炎的总体准确率,分别为:IBD-SCAN 91/100%,PhiCal检测89/100%,LEUKO-TEST 83/89%,Hexagon OBTI 77/84%,C反应蛋白71/79%,以及血白细胞63/68%。用粪便标志物区分炎症性肠病与其他形式结肠炎的情况如下:总体准确率范围为43%至50%。区分肠易激综合征与缓解期克罗恩病(CDAI<150)患者的总体准确率(百分比)为:IBD-SCAN 90,PhiCal检测90,LEUKO-TEST 85,Hexagon OBTI 77。与缓解期患者相比,CDAI>150的克罗恩病患者的钙卫蛋白和乳铁蛋白显著升高。门诊患者粪便采样的可行性较高(接受率95%)。
IBD-SCAN和PhiCal检测在检测结肠炎方面总体准确率最高,其次是LEUKO-TEST、Hexagon OBTI、C反应蛋白和血白细胞。即使是缓解期的克罗恩病患者,粪便标志物的准确率也很高。门诊患者粪便采样的可行性较高。由于粪便标志物不具有特异性,内镜检查对于确定结肠炎的潜在病因仍然至关重要。