Suppr超能文献

[特发性炎症性肠病患者的钙卫蛋白水平:两种商业检测方法的比较]

[Calprotectin levels in patients with idiopathic inflammatory bowel disease comparison of two commercial tests].

作者信息

Malícková K, Janatková I, Bortlík M, Komárek V, Lukás M

机构信息

Ustav klinické biochemie a laboratorní diagnostiky VFN a 1. LF U.K v Praze.

出版信息

Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol. 2008 Nov;57(4):147-53.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Fecal calprotectin test is a simple, non-invasive, rapid and inexpensive diagnostic tool allowing differentiation between GIT functional disorders and inflammatory conditions and relapse prediction in non-specific inflammatory bowel disease. In the last year, commercially available ELISA diagnostic kits, using either monoclonal or polyclonal antibodies against a heterodimeric complex, calprotectin, for the detection of fecal calprotectin, started to be marketed.

OBJECTIVE

To compare two ELISA kits for the detection of fecal calprotectin differing from each other in the used type of antibody (monoclonal versus polyclonal).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Two ELISA kits were assessed: Calprotectin ELISA (Bühlmann, Basel, Switzerland) using a monoclonal antibody against calprotectin and PhiCal Calprotectin ELISA (R-Biopharm, Darmstadt, Germany) using a polyclonal antibody against calprotectin. We analyzed fecal eluates from patients with Crohn's disease (CD, n=36) and ulcerous colitis (UC, n=29) and from healthy controls (n=98). Data were analyzed using software Statistica CZ 8.0 (Statsoft, Tulsa, U.S.A.) and measurement variability parameters (linearity, repeatability, stability) and test sensitivity and specificity were established and the methods were compared.

RESULTS

The two kits showed adequate accuracy (intra- and inter-assay variation < 10%). The dilution linearity test indicated superiority of the Calprotectin ELISA Bühlmann kit, in particular for high calprotectin levels. The results of the two methods showed good correlation: Pearson's correlation coefficient r = 0.83, limit difference according to Bland-Altman plot ranged from 17% to 30%. Diagnostic sensivity rates were 79% for the Calprotectin ELISA Bühlmann kit and 74% for the Calprotectin ELISA R-Biopharm kit, the test specificity rates were 87% and 84%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Both of the tested kits have comparably good measurement parameters, the Bühlmann kit using monoclonal antibody against calprotectin showed higher sensitivity and specificity. In view of their availability, sensitivity and performance, the fecal calprotectin ELISA kits are helpful diagnostic tools for clinical practice.

摘要

背景

粪便钙卫蛋白检测是一种简单、无创、快速且廉价的诊断工具,可用于区分胃肠道功能紊乱和炎症状态,以及预测非特异性炎症性肠病的复发。去年,市面上开始销售使用针对异二聚体复合物钙卫蛋白的单克隆或多克隆抗体来检测粪便钙卫蛋白的酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)诊断试剂盒。

目的

比较两种用于检测粪便钙卫蛋白的ELISA试剂盒,这两种试剂盒在所用抗体类型(单克隆抗体与多克隆抗体)上有所不同。

材料与方法

评估了两种ELISA试剂盒:使用抗钙卫蛋白单克隆抗体的钙卫蛋白ELISA试剂盒(瑞士巴塞尔的布尔曼公司)和使用抗钙卫蛋白多克隆抗体的PhiCal钙卫蛋白ELISA试剂盒(德国达姆施塔特的R - 生物制药公司)。我们分析了克罗恩病(CD,n = 36)、溃疡性结肠炎(UC,n = 29)患者以及健康对照者(n = 98)的粪便洗脱液。使用Statistica CZ 8.0软件(美国塔尔萨的Statsoft公司)对数据进行分析,确定测量变异参数(线性、重复性、稳定性)以及检测灵敏度和特异性,并对这两种方法进行比较。

结果

两种试剂盒均显示出足够的准确性(批内和批间变异<10%)。稀释线性试验表明布尔曼公司的钙卫蛋白ELISA试剂盒具有优势,尤其是对于高钙卫蛋白水平。两种方法的结果显示出良好的相关性:皮尔逊相关系数r = 0.83,根据布兰德 - 奥特曼图的极限差值范围为17%至30%。布尔曼公司的钙卫蛋白ELISA试剂盒诊断灵敏度为79%,R - 生物制药公司的钙卫蛋白ELISA试剂盒诊断灵敏度为74%,检测特异性分别为87%和84%。

结论

两种测试试剂盒均具有相当良好的测量参数,使用抗钙卫蛋白单克隆抗体的布尔曼试剂盒显示出更高的灵敏度和特异性。鉴于其可用性、灵敏度和性能,粪便钙卫蛋白ELISA试剂盒是临床实践中有用的诊断工具。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验