Foissner Wilhelm, Müller Helga, Agatha Sabine
Universität Salzburg, FB Organismische Biologie, Hellbrunnerstrasse 34, A-5020, Salzburg, Austria.
Eur J Protistol. 2007 Nov;43(4):295-314. doi: 10.1016/j.ejop.2007.06.001. Epub 2007 Sep 4.
So far, neither morphology nor gene sequences have provided a reliable classification of halteriid and hypotrichid spirotrichs. Thus, we performed a comparative study on the fine structure of the resting cysts in some representative species, viz., the oligotrichs Halteria grandinella and Pelagostrombidium fallax and the oxytrichid hypotrichs Laurentiella strenua, Steinia sphagnicola, and Oxytricha granulifera. Main results include: (i) there are three different, very likely non-homologous cyst surface ornamentations, viz., spines (generated by the ectocyst), thorns (generated by the mesocyst), and lepidosomes (produced in the cytoplasm); (ii) Halteria has a perilemma; (iii) Halteria, Meseres and Pelagostrombidium have fibrous lepidosomes, while those of Oxytricha are tubular; (iv) the cyst wall structure of Pelagostrombidium and Strombidium is distinctly different from that of halteriids and oxytrichids, which are rather similar in this respect; (v) cyst ornamentation does not provide a reliable phylogenetic signal in oxytrichid hypotrichs because ectocyst spines occur in both flexible and rigid genera. The new observations and literature data were used to investigate the phylogeny of the core Spirotrichea. The Hennigian argumentation scheme and computer algorithms showed that the spirotrichs are bound together by the macronuclear reorganization band, the subepiplasmic microtubule basket, and the apokinetal stomatogenesis. The Hypotrichida and Oligotrichida are united by a very strong synapomorphy, viz., the perilemma, not found in any other member of the phylum. Halteriid and oligotrichid spirotrichs form a sister group supported by as many as 13 apomorphies. Thus, the molecular data, which classify the halteriids within the core hypotrichs, need to be reconsidered.
到目前为止,形态学和基因序列都未能为裸口目和尖毛虫类腹毛目纤毛虫提供可靠的分类依据。因此,我们对一些代表性物种,即寡毛目纤毛虫大弹跳虫(Halteria grandinella)和衰弱拟漂流虫(Pelagostrombidium fallax)以及尖毛虫类腹毛目纤毛虫强壮劳伦虫(Laurentiella strenua)、泥炭藓斯氏虫(Steinia sphagnicola)和颗粒尖毛虫(Oxytricha granulifera)休眠包囊的精细结构进行了比较研究。主要结果包括:(i)存在三种不同的、很可能非同源的包囊表面纹饰,即棘(由外质膜产生)、刺(由中质膜产生)和鳞片体(在细胞质中产生);(ii)弹跳虫有一层围膜;(iii)弹跳虫、梅泽雷斯虫(Meseres)和拟漂流虫有纤维状鳞片体,而尖毛虫的鳞片体是管状的;(iv)拟漂流虫和漂流虫的包囊壁结构与裸口目和尖毛虫类腹毛目的明显不同,后两者在这方面相当相似;(v)在尖毛虫类腹毛目中,包囊纹饰不能提供可靠的系统发育信号,因为外质膜棘在柔韧类群和刚硬类群中都有出现。利用这些新观察结果和文献数据来研究核心腹毛目的系统发育。亨尼希论证方案和计算机算法表明,腹毛目通过大核重组带、表质下微管篮和无动基口发生联系在一起。下毛目和寡毛目通过一个非常强的共衍征联合在一起,即围膜,在该门的任何其他成员中都未发现。裸口目和寡毛目腹毛目纤毛虫形成一个姐妹群,有多达13个共衍征支持。因此,将裸口目纤毛虫归类于核心下毛目的分子数据需要重新考虑。