Organo Catherine, Murphy Patrick
Advisory Services Division, Radiological Protection Institute of Ireland, 3 Clonskeagh Square, Clonskeagh Road, Dublin 14, Republic of Ireland.
J Radiol Prot. 2007 Sep;27(3):275-85. doi: 10.1088/0952-4746/27/3/002. Epub 2007 Aug 29.
In July 2003, a house with a seasonally adjusted annual average radon concentration of 49 000 Bq m(-3) was identified near Castleisland in County Kerry (SW Ireland). The possibility that other houses with similar extreme radon concentrations could be present in the surrounding area triggered the setting up of a localised radon survey, the so-called 'Castleisland Radon Survey' (CRS). To this end, approximately 2500 householders living in four 10 x 10 km2 grid squares from the Irish grid closest to the town of Castleisland were invited to participate. Four hundred and eighteen householders responded to the invitation (17% response rate) and 383 home results were used for further analysis. In the 400 km2 encompassing the four studied grid squares, 14% of the homes were found to have a seasonally adjusted annual average radon concentration above the national reference level of 200 Bq m(-3) while 2% above 800 Bq m(-3). An average radon concentration of 147 Bq m(-3) was calculated. This can be compared with the average radon concentration of 98 Bq m(-3) calculated for the same four grid squares on the basis of 80 measurements carried out during the Irish National Radon Survey (NRS) which was conducted between 1992 and 1997. The fourth highest radon concentration (6184 Bq m(-3)) and three of the ten highest ever measured in Ireland were all identified during the CRS. This shows that localised and targeted radon surveys are an invaluable tool for the identification of homes at highest risk from high radon concentrations. Two of the four grid squares investigated during the CRS are currently designated as high radon areas (defined as areas where 10% or more of all houses are predicted to exceed 200 Bq m(-3)) as predicted by the NRS. A thorough statistical analysis of the CRS and NRS data was carried out and indicated that both datasets could be merged and used to refine the original NRS predictions. The results indicate that two of the four studied grid squares could potentially be redesignated. The practical feasibility and overall benefit of updating the Irish radon map in light of this analysis is described.
2003年7月,在爱尔兰西南部凯里郡卡斯尔岛附近发现了一所房屋,其经季节性调整的年平均氡浓度为49000贝克勒尔每立方米。周边地区可能还存在其他氡浓度类似的极端情况,这促使开展了一项局部氡调查,即所谓的“卡斯尔岛氡调查”(CRS)。为此,邀请了居住在离卡斯尔岛镇最近的爱尔兰网格中四个10×10平方千米网格方块内的约2500户居民参与。418户居民回应了邀请(回应率为17%),383份家庭检测结果用于进一步分析。在涵盖这四个研究网格方块的400平方千米区域内,发现14%的家庭经季节性调整的年平均氡浓度高于国家参考水平200贝克勒尔每立方米,2%的家庭高于800贝克勒尔每立方米。计算得出平均氡浓度为147贝克勒尔每立方米。这可与在1992年至1997年进行的爱尔兰国家氡调查(NRS)期间,基于对同一四个网格方块进行的80次测量所计算出的98贝克勒尔每立方米的平均氡浓度相比较。CRS期间确定了爱尔兰测量到的第四高氡浓度(6184贝克勒尔每立方米)以及十个最高浓度中的三个。这表明局部和有针对性的氡调查是识别氡浓度高风险房屋的宝贵工具。CRS期间调查的四个网格方块中有两个目前被NRS预测指定为高氡区域(定义为预计10%或更多房屋超过200贝克勒尔每立方米的区域)。对CRS和NRS数据进行了全面的统计分析,结果表明两个数据集可以合并并用于完善原始的NRS预测。结果表明,四个研究网格方块中的两个可能需要重新指定。文中描述了根据这一分析更新爱尔兰氡地图的实际可行性和总体益处。