Rubin D M, Hunter R E
Science. 1987 Jul 17;237(4812):276-8. doi: 10.1126/science.237.4812.276.
Many kinds of sediment bedforms are presumed to trend either normal or parallel to the direction of sediment transport. For this reason, the trend of bedforms observed by remote sensing or by field observations is commonly used as an indicator of the direction of sediment transport. Such presumptions regarding bedform trend were tested experimentally in bidirectional flows by rotating a sand-covered board in steady winds. Transverse, oblique, and longitudinal bedforms were created by changing only two parameters: the angle between the two winds and the proportions of sand transported in the two directions. Regardless of whether the experimental bedforms were transverse, oblique, or longitudinal (as defined by the bedform trend relative to the resultant transport direction), they all had trends that yielded the maximum gross transport across the bedforms. The fact that many of the experimental bedforms were neither transverse nor parallel to the resultant transport direction suggests that transport directions cannot be accurately determined by presuming such alignment.
许多种类的沉积物床形被推测为与沉积物搬运方向垂直或平行。因此,通过遥感或实地观测所观察到的床形趋势通常被用作沉积物搬运方向的指标。通过在稳定风中旋转一块覆盖着沙子的木板,在双向水流中对有关床形趋势的此类推测进行了实验测试。仅通过改变两个参数:两种风之间的角度以及在两个方向上搬运的沙子比例,就形成了横向、斜向和纵向床形。无论实验床形是横向、斜向还是纵向的(根据床形相对于合成搬运方向的趋势来定义),它们都具有能使穿过床形的总搬运量达到最大的趋势。许多实验床形既不与合成搬运方向横向也不平行这一事实表明,不能通过假定这种对齐关系来准确确定搬运方向。