• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于老年人家庭的一个新神话?

A new myth about families of older people?

作者信息

High D M

机构信息

Department of Philosophy, University of Kentucky, Lexington 40506.

出版信息

Gerontologist. 1991 Oct;31(5):611-8. doi: 10.1093/geront/31.5.611.

DOI:10.1093/geront/31.5.611
PMID:1778486
Abstract

Are gerontologists creating a new myth about families by emphasizing individual autonomy as independence without family interdependence, by advocating advance directives instead of supporting a rebuttable presumption of family surrogates, and following the lead of the U.S. Supreme Court in the Cruzan case (Cruzan v. Director, 1990), by ignoring intergenerational interdependencies in surrogate decision making? This paper argues that another antifamily trend is developing despite empirical evidence showing that elderly persons themselves prefer family members to represent them in surrogate decision making. Research and public policy suggestions are offered for protecting the elderly's preferences.

摘要

老年医学专家是否正在创造一个关于家庭的新神话?他们强调个人自主性即独立而不依赖家庭相互依存,提倡预先指示而非支持可反驳的家庭替代推定,并在美国最高法院关于克鲁赞案(克鲁赞诉主任,1990年)的引领下,在替代决策中忽视代际相互依存关系?本文认为,尽管有实证证据表明老年人自己更倾向于让家庭成员在替代决策中代表他们,但另一种反家庭趋势正在发展。本文还提供了保护老年人偏好的研究和公共政策建议。

相似文献

1
A new myth about families of older people?关于老年人家庭的一个新神话?
Gerontologist. 1991 Oct;31(5):611-8. doi: 10.1093/geront/31.5.611.
2
After the Cruzan case: the primary care physician and the use of advance directives.克鲁赞案之后:初级保健医生与预立医疗指示的使用
J Am Board Fam Pract. 1992 Mar-Apr;5(2):201-5.
3
Practicing medicine, fiduciary trust privacy, and public moral interloping after Cruzan.克鲁赞案后的行医、信托隐私与公共道德介入
J Med Philos. 1992 Dec;17(6):647-64. doi: 10.1093/jmp/17.6.647.
4
Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of Health.克鲁赞诉密苏里州卫生部主任案
Wests Supreme Court Report. 1990 Jun 25;110:2841-92.
5
Nancy Cruzan in China.南希·克鲁赞在中国。
Hastings Cent Rep. 1990 Sep-Oct;20(5):39-41.
6
Cruzan and its impact on patient self-determination.克鲁赞案及其对患者自我决定权的影响。
J Fam Law. 1991;30(1):111-33.
7
Advance directives: where are we heading after Cruzan?预立医疗指示:克鲁赞案之后我们将走向何方?
Law Med Health Care. 1990 Winter;18(4):353-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1990.tb01151.x.
8
Family matters: is big brother your next-of-kin?家庭事务:大哥是你的近亲吗?
Reason. 1990 Nov;22(6):36-9.
9
Advance directives under state law and judicial decisions.
Law Med Health Care. 1991 Spring-Summer;19(1-2):91-100. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1991.tb01802.x.
10
Public policy in the wake of Cruzan: a case study of New York's health care proxy law.
Law Med Health Care. 1990 Winter;18(4):360-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.1990.tb01152.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Decision-making within the social course of dementia: accounts by Chinese-American caregivers.痴呆症社会进程中的决策:美籍华裔照料者的叙述
Cult Med Psychiatry. 1999 Dec;23(4):415-52. doi: 10.1023/a:1005563918721.