Suppr超能文献

两种用于抗Sp100测定的酶联免疫吸附测定法的比较。

Comparison of two ELISA assays for anti-Sp100 determination.

作者信息

Manuel Lucena José, Montes Cano Marcos, Luis Caro José, Respaldiza Nieves, Alvarez Antonia, Sánchez-Román Julio, Núñez-Roldán Antonio, Wichmann Ingeborg

机构信息

Department of Immunology, Hospitales Universitarios Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain.

出版信息

Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2007 Aug;1109:203-11. doi: 10.1196/annals.1398.024.

Abstract

Antibodies to Sp100 have been described not only in primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC), but also in other diseases. Two assays for detection of Sp100 levels by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) have been compared in a cohort of patients from our area: (a) Sp100 kit produced by IMTEC, Immunodiagnostica GmbH, and (b) Quanta Lite Sp100 kit produced by INOVA Diagnostics. We analyze here the correlation between the two assays and compare their efficiency in diagnosing PBC. We also comment on the exceptions derived from reactivity with other diseases. We studied 78 sera by IIF with the typical multiple nuclear dots (MND) pattern from patients who suffered from PBC, hepatopathies different from PBC, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), other connective tissue diseases (CTD), skeletal diseases, lung diseases, hematological disorders, a miscellaneous group, and a healthy IIF negative control group. The tests work equally well despite their different quantification system: (a) it is based on a standard curve; and (b) it is based on a single-point antigen-specific calibration. Some discrepancies could be explained by differences in the immunodominant epitope used in the ELISA. The main finding of this study is that the presence of MND/Sp100-positive antibodies were detected not only in hepatic diseases, mainly PBC, but also in other clinical conditions, confirmed by both tests. Diagnosis of PBC must be established in the right clinical context, because other diseases recognizing the same epitope, mainly SLE, may also show high Sp100 levels. Sera from PBC patients with antimitochondrial antibodies (AMA) showed higher anti-Sp100 than the AMA-negative group.

摘要

不仅在原发性胆汁性肝硬化(PBC)患者中发现了抗Sp100抗体,在其他疾病患者中也有发现。我们对本地区一组患者采用酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)检测Sp100水平的两种方法进行了比较:(a)由Immunodiagnostica GmbH公司的IMTEC生产的Sp100试剂盒;(b)由INOVA Diagnostics公司生产的Quanta Lite Sp100试剂盒。我们在此分析这两种检测方法之间的相关性,并比较它们在诊断PBC方面的效率。我们还对与其他疾病反应性相关的例外情况进行了评论。我们用间接免疫荧光法(IIF)研究了78份血清,这些血清来自患有PBC、非PBC肝病、系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)、其他结缔组织病(CTD)、骨骼疾病、肺部疾病、血液系统疾病、杂项组的患者以及健康的IIF阴性对照组,呈现典型的多核点(MND)模式。尽管这两种检测方法的定量系统不同,但检测效果相同:(a)一种基于标准曲线;(b)另一种基于单点抗原特异性校准。ELISA中使用的免疫显性表位的差异可以解释一些差异。本研究的主要发现是,两种检测方法均证实,不仅在主要为PBC的肝脏疾病中检测到了MND/Sp100阳性抗体,在其他临床情况下也检测到了。必须在正确的临床背景下确立PBC的诊断,因为其他识别相同表位的疾病,主要是SLE,也可能显示Sp100水平升高。患有抗线粒体抗体(AMA)的PBC患者血清中的抗Sp100水平高于AMA阴性组。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验