• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项关于烧伤患者股静脉与非股静脉置管的前瞻性安全性研究。

A prospective safety study of femoral vein versus nonfemoral vein catheterization in patients with burns.

作者信息

Murr M M, Rosenquist M D, Lewis R W, Heinle J A, Kealey G P

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City 52242.

出版信息

J Burn Care Rehabil. 1991 Nov-Dec;12(6):576-8. doi: 10.1097/00004630-199111000-00014.

DOI:10.1097/00004630-199111000-00014
PMID:1779013
Abstract

A prospective study was undertaken to determine the safety of femoral vein catheterization in patients with burns. Forty-two patients had a total of 275 catheterizations and were divided into two groups: group 1, femoral vein catheterization = 80 catheters and group 2, nonfemoral vein catheterization = 195 catheters (180 subclavian, 8 internal jugular, and 7 supraclavicular). All catheters were changed to new sites every 48 hours, and dressings were changed every 24 hours. Bacteriologic surveillance was accomplished by submitting the tip and subcutaneous segment of the catheter for semiquantitative cultures. Skin exit-site cultures were obtained, and blood was drawn through the catheters for fungal-isolator cultures before removal. Catheter colonization was defined as greater than or equal to 5 colony-forming units on either the subcutaneous segment or the catheter tip. Catheter-related sepsis was diagnosed when the same organism was recovered from the fungal isolator bottle and either part of the catheter and when there was no other identifiable source of sepsis. The rate of occurrence of colonized catheters was 7.5% (6 of 80) in the femoral vein catheterization group and 13.8% (27 of 195) in the nonfemoral vein catheterization group. Catheter-related sepsis occurred in 2.5% (2 of 80) of femoral and 1% (2 of 195) of nonfemoral catheters. None of these differences are statistically significant. There were no noninfectious complications from femoral vein catheterization. Two subclavian catheters had to be repositioned. This study suggests that central venous access in patients with burns can be safely employed with the use of the femoral vein.

摘要

开展了一项前瞻性研究,以确定烧伤患者股静脉置管的安全性。42例患者共进行了275次置管,并分为两组:第1组,股静脉置管80次;第2组,非股静脉置管195次(180次锁骨下静脉置管、8次颈内静脉置管和7次锁骨上静脉置管)。所有导管每48小时更换至新部位,敷料每24小时更换。通过提交导管尖端和皮下段进行半定量培养来完成细菌学监测。获取皮肤出口部位培养物,并在拔除导管前通过导管抽取血液进行真菌隔离培养。导管定植定义为皮下段或导管尖端的菌落形成单位大于或等于5个。当从真菌隔离瓶以及导管的任何一部分中分离出相同的微生物,且没有其他可识别的败血症来源时,诊断为导管相关性败血症。股静脉置管组导管定植发生率为7.5%(80例中的6例),非股静脉置管组为13.8%(195例中的27例)。股静脉导管相关性败血症发生率为2.5%(80例中的2例),非股静脉导管为1%(195例中的2例)。这些差异均无统计学意义。股静脉置管未出现非感染性并发症。两根锁骨下静脉导管需要重新定位。本研究表明,烧伤患者可安全地使用股静脉进行中心静脉置管。

相似文献

1
A prospective safety study of femoral vein versus nonfemoral vein catheterization in patients with burns.一项关于烧伤患者股静脉与非股静脉置管的前瞻性安全性研究。
J Burn Care Rehabil. 1991 Nov-Dec;12(6):576-8. doi: 10.1097/00004630-199111000-00014.
2
Femoral venous access is safe in burned children: an analysis of 224 catheters.
J Pediatr. 1997 Mar;130(3):442-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(97)70208-7.
3
Percutaneous femoral venous catheterizations: a prospective study of complications.经皮股静脉置管术:并发症的前瞻性研究
J Pediatr. 1989 Mar;114(3):411-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(89)80559-1.
4
The incidence of infectious complications of central venous catheters at the subclavian, internal jugular, and femoral sites in an intensive care unit population.重症监护病房人群中锁骨下、颈内静脉和股静脉部位中心静脉导管感染并发症的发生率。
Crit Care Med. 2005 Jan;33(1):13-20; discussion 234-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000149838.47048.60.
5
Comparison of Oligon catheters and chlorhexidine-impregnated sponges with standard multilumen central venous catheters for prevention of associated colonization and infections in intensive care unit patients: a multicenter, randomized, controlled study.对比寡肽导管和氯己定浸渍海绵与标准多腔中心静脉导管在预防重症监护病房患者相关定植和感染的效果:一项多中心、随机、对照研究。
Crit Care Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):420-9. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31822f0d4b.
6
A prospective evaluation of the use of femoral venous catheters in critically ill adults.对危重症成年患者使用股静脉导管的前瞻性评估。
Crit Care Med. 1997 Dec;25(12):1986-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199712000-00014.
7
Complications of femoral and subclavian venous catheterization in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial.危重症患者股静脉和锁骨下静脉置管的并发症:一项随机对照试验
JAMA. 2001 Aug 8;286(6):700-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.6.700.
8
Femoral vs jugular venous catheterization and risk of nosocomial events in adults requiring acute renal replacement therapy: a randomized controlled trial.成人急性肾替代治疗中股静脉与颈内静脉置管及医院感染事件风险:一项随机对照试验
JAMA. 2008 May 28;299(20):2413-22. doi: 10.1001/jama.299.20.2413.
9
Central venous catheter sepsis with weekly catheter change in paediatric burn patients: an analysis of 221 catheters.小儿烧伤患者中心静脉导管败血症与每周更换导管:221根导管的分析
Burns. 1995 Mar;21(2):127-9. doi: 10.1016/0305-4179(95)92137-2.
10
Jugular versus femoral short-term catheterization and risk of infection in intensive care unit patients. Causal analysis of two randomized trials.颈内静脉与股静脉短期置管与 ICU 患者感染风险。两项随机试验的因果分析。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013 Nov 15;188(10):1232-9. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201303-0460OC.

引用本文的文献

1
Emergency Department Placed Central Lines for Trauma Patients: A Retrospective Case-Control Study on Central Line-Associated Blood Stream Infection Risk From Central Lines Placed Emergently in the Emergency Department.急诊科为创伤患者置入中心静脉导管:一项关于急诊科紧急置入中心静脉导管相关血流感染风险的回顾性病例对照研究。
J Am Coll Emerg Physicians Open. 2025 Feb 13;6(2):100047. doi: 10.1016/j.acepjo.2025.100047. eCollection 2025 Apr.
2
Expert consensus-based clinical practice guidelines management of intravascular catheters in the intensive care unit.基于专家共识的重症监护病房血管内导管管理临床实践指南
Ann Intensive Care. 2020 Sep 7;10(1):118. doi: 10.1186/s13613-020-00713-4.
3
Transpulmonary thermodilution using femoral indicator injection: a prospective trial in patients with a femoral and a jugular central venous catheter.
经股动脉指示剂注射的肺内热稀释法:一项在同时使用股静脉和颈内静脉中央导管的患者中的前瞻性试验。
Crit Care. 2010;14(3):R95. doi: 10.1186/cc9030. Epub 2010 May 25.
4
Influence of insertion site on central venous catheter colonization and bloodstream infection rates.穿刺部位对中心静脉导管定植及血流感染率的影响。
Intensive Care Med. 2008 Jun;34(6):1038-45. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1046-3. Epub 2008 Mar 4.