• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经皮股静脉置管术:并发症的前瞻性研究

Percutaneous femoral venous catheterizations: a prospective study of complications.

作者信息

Stenzel J P, Green T P, Fuhrman B P, Carlson P E, Marchessault R P

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55455.

出版信息

J Pediatr. 1989 Mar;114(3):411-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(89)80559-1.

DOI:10.1016/s0022-3476(89)80559-1
PMID:2921683
Abstract

In a prospective, 45-month study, we compared the complication rates of percutaneously placed femoral and nonfemoral central venous catheters in critically ill pediatric patients. Forty-one percent of the 395 central venous catheters placed during this interval were femoral. Noninfectious complications were recognized for 2.5% of femoral catheters and 2.1% of nonfemoral catheters. Only three complications occurred with catheter insertion, all during nonfemoral attempts. Systemic infections that were possibly attributable to the central venous catheter were found in 3.7% of patients with femoral catheters and 7.3% of those with nonfemoral catheters. Femoral venous catheterization offers several practical advantages for central access over other sites. The low incidence of complications documented in this study suggests that the femoral vein is the preferred site in most critically ill children when central venous catheterization is indicated.

摘要

在一项为期45个月的前瞻性研究中,我们比较了危重症儿科患者经皮放置的股静脉和非股静脉中心静脉导管的并发症发生率。在此期间放置的395根中心静脉导管中,41%为股静脉导管。股静脉导管的非感染性并发症发生率为2.5%,非股静脉导管为2.1%。仅在导管插入过程中出现了3例并发症,均发生在非股静脉置管尝试时。股静脉导管相关的全身感染发生率在股静脉导管患者中为3.7%,在非股静脉导管患者中为7.3%。与其他部位相比,股静脉置管在中心静脉通路方面具有几个实际优势。本研究记录的低并发症发生率表明,在大多数需要进行中心静脉置管的危重症儿童中,股静脉是首选部位。

相似文献

1
Percutaneous femoral venous catheterizations: a prospective study of complications.经皮股静脉置管术:并发症的前瞻性研究
J Pediatr. 1989 Mar;114(3):411-5. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(89)80559-1.
2
Femoral vascular catheterization in critically ill infants and children.危重症婴幼儿的股血管插管术。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 1997 Jun;36(6):311-9. doi: 10.1177/000992289703600601.
3
Efficacy of subcutaneous tunneling for prevention of bacterial colonization of femoral central venous catheters in critically ill children.皮下隧道法预防危重症儿童股静脉中心静脉导管细菌定植的疗效
Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2002 Nov;21(11):1000-4. doi: 10.1097/00006454-200211000-00005.
4
Percutaneous central venous catheterisation in critically ill children.危重症儿童的经皮中心静脉置管术
Med J Malaysia. 1998 Dec;53(4):413-6.
5
A prospective safety study of femoral vein versus nonfemoral vein catheterization in patients with burns.一项关于烧伤患者股静脉与非股静脉置管的前瞻性安全性研究。
J Burn Care Rehabil. 1991 Nov-Dec;12(6):576-8. doi: 10.1097/00004630-199111000-00014.
6
Inferior vena cava catheterization in the neonate by the percutaneous femoral vein method.经皮股静脉法新生儿下腔静脉插管术。
J Perinatol. 1996 Mar-Apr;16(2 Pt 1):129-32.
7
Mechanical and infectious complications of central venous cannulation in children: lessons learned from a 10-year experience placing more than 1000 catheters.儿童中心静脉置管的机械性和感染性并发症:从10年放置1000余根导管的经验中吸取的教训
J Burn Care Res. 2006 Sep-Oct;27(5):713-8. doi: 10.1097/01.BCR.0000238087.12064.E0.
8
Complications associated with 2 different types of percutaneously inserted central venous catheters in very low birth weight infants.极低出生体重儿两种不同类型经皮中心静脉置管相关并发症。
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2011 Mar;32(3):258-66. doi: 10.1086/658335.
9
Symptomatic catheter-associated thrombosis in pediatric trauma patients: Choose your access wisely.儿童创伤患者有症状的导管相关血栓形成:明智选择置管部位。
Surgery. 2019 Dec;166(6):1117-1121. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2019.05.018. Epub 2019 Sep 13.
10
Are femoral Broviac catheters effective and safe? A prospective comparison of femoral and jugular venous broviac catheters in newborn infants.股静脉 Broviac 导管有效且安全吗?新生儿股静脉与颈静脉 Broviac 导管的前瞻性比较。
Chest. 2002 May;121(5):1527-30. doi: 10.1378/chest.121.5.1527.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of the Trendelenburg position and the Valsalva manoeuvre on internal jugular vein diameter and placement in children.特伦德伦伯格体位和瓦尔萨尔瓦动作对儿童颈内静脉直径及位置的影响。
Singapore Med J. 2015 Aug;56(8):468-71. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2015020.
2
Access technique and its problems in parenteral nutrition - Guidelines on Parenteral Nutrition, Chapter 9.肠外营养的通路技术及其问题——《肠外营养指南》第9章
Ger Med Sci. 2009 Nov 18;7:Doc19. doi: 10.3205/000078.
3
Modification of Seldinger technique for introduction of femoral lines in newborns.
新生儿股静脉置管时塞丁格技术的改良
Indian J Pediatr. 2009 Sep;76(9):965. doi: 10.1007/s12098-009-0097-y.
4
Infectious complications of percutaneous central venous catheterization in pediatric patients: a Spanish multicenter study.儿童经皮中心静脉置管的感染并发症:一项西班牙多中心研究
Intensive Care Med. 2007 Mar;33(3):466-76. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0508-8. Epub 2007 Jan 19.
5
Radiographic inguinal curl may indicate paraspinal misplacement of percutaneously inserted central venous catheters: report of three cases.影像学腹股沟卷曲可能提示经皮插入中心静脉导管的椎旁错位:三例报告
Pediatr Radiol. 2005 Jul;35(7):684-7. doi: 10.1007/s00247-005-1464-0. Epub 2005 Apr 21.
6
[Vascular access in emergency paediatric anaesthesia].[小儿急诊麻醉中的血管通路]
Anaesthesist. 2005 Jan;54(1):8-16. doi: 10.1007/s00101-004-0794-x.
7
Clinical review: vascular access for fluid infusion in children.临床综述:儿童液体输注的血管通路
Crit Care. 2004 Dec;8(6):478-84. doi: 10.1186/cc2880. Epub 2004 Jun 3.
8
Multilumen central venous catheters in children: relative potential to perforate vessels. An in vitro study.儿童多腔中心静脉导管:血管穿孔的相对可能性。一项体外研究。
J Clin Monit. 1997 Mar;13(2):75-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1007389228641.
9
Inferior vena cava thrombosis as a complication of femoral vein catheterisation.股静脉置管并发症——下腔静脉血栓形成
Arch Dis Child. 1995 Apr;72(4):343-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.72.4.343.