Aubel S, Wozney P, Edwards R P
University of Pittsburgh, Department of Radiology, Pennsylvania.
Magn Reson Imaging. 1991;9(4):485-91. doi: 10.1016/0730-725x(91)90033-i.
The clinical utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnosis of gynecologic masses was evaluated in 25 patients. In each patient the final pathologic diagnosis was semiquantitatively correlated with the diagnostic impressions from pelvic examination, ultrasound and MRI. There were 9 uterine, 11 ovarian and 5 nonovarian pelvic masses. Pelvic examination correlation with final diagnosis was 26%, consistent with the literature. Ultrasound fared surprisingly poorly, with only 44% correlation. MRI showed an 87% correlation with the final diagnosis. MRI was able to accurately identify masses, discriminate adnexal masses from fluid-filled bowel, identify dermoids, and in one case obviated surgery in a pregnant patient. MRI provided significant clinical management information with greater accuracy than did ultrasound or pelvic examination.
对25例患者评估了磁共振成像(MRI)在妇科肿块诊断中的临床效用。对每位患者,将最终病理诊断与盆腔检查、超声及MRI的诊断印象进行半定量关联。有9例子宫肿块、11例卵巢肿块和5例非卵巢盆腔肿块。盆腔检查与最终诊断的关联度为26%,与文献一致。超声表现出人意料地差,关联度仅为44%。MRI与最终诊断的关联度为87%。MRI能够准确识别肿块,区分附件肿块与充满液体的肠管,识别皮样囊肿,并且在1例孕妇中避免了手术。与超声或盆腔检查相比,MRI以更高的准确性提供了重要的临床管理信息。