DeLucia P R, Hochberg J
Columbia University, New York, New York.
Percept Psychophys. 1991 Dec;50(6):547-54. doi: 10.3758/bf03207539.
The Müller-Lyer and Ponzo illusions were obtained under free binocular viewing of three-dimensional objects, and the function relating magnitude of illusion to fin angle, characteristic of converging-line versions of the Müller-Lyer pattern, was closely paralleled by volumetric (three-cone), line-free objects (but not with an erect, planar "walk-through" construction and moving observers). Illusions cannot be dismissed as artifacts of static, impoverished viewing, therefore, but must be explained within any general theory of perception. Perspective explanations have difficulties with such three-dimensional manifestations, and seem completely inapplicable to our further finding that approximately the same amount of illusion occurred in objects and patterns with no oblique lines or edges. Confusion or averaging theories, not themselves tested here, remain unthreatened by these data.
米勒-莱尔错觉和庞佐错觉是在对三维物体进行自由双眼观察的情况下获得的,并且将错觉大小与鳍角相关联的函数,这是米勒-莱尔图案的汇聚线版本的特征,与立体(三锥体)、无线条物体密切相似(但不适用于直立的平面“穿行”结构和移动的观察者)。因此,错觉不能被视为静态、贫乏观察的人为产物,而必须在任何一般的感知理论中得到解释。透视解释在处理这种三维表现形式时存在困难,并且似乎完全不适用于我们进一步的发现,即在没有斜线或边缘的物体和图案中也出现了大致相同程度的错觉。混淆或平均理论(本文未对其进行检验)并未受到这些数据的威胁。