• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用动态压力测量评估垫子。

Evaluation of cushions using dynamic pressure measurement.

作者信息

Bar C A

机构信息

Rehabilitation Engineering Section, Rookwood Hospital, Cardiff, UK.

出版信息

Prosthet Orthot Int. 1991 Dec;15(3):232-40. doi: 10.3109/03093649109164293.

DOI:10.3109/03093649109164293
PMID:1780227
Abstract

Reduction of pressures generated in the tissues overlying the ischial tuberosities is an important measure for predicting a cushion's effectiveness. In particular, the pressure-time relationship is significant in the prevention of pressure sores. In this study a dynamic pressure monitoring system was used to obtain pressure-time profiles for 25 spinal cord injured subjects. Each subject tested three types of cushion (Foam, Gel (Aberdeen) and Roho) for periods of two hours each during which routine activities were performed. Results obtained were broadly comparable with previous studies. Average pressures were: Foam 87.6mmHg (11.6kPa); Gel 68.6mmHg (9kPa) and Roho 54.6mmHg (6.7kPa). Pressure-time histograms are presented for three subjects for each cushion. These show inter-subject variability on the same cushion as well as intra-subject variability on different cushions. Therefore individual patient assessment is important in providing the most appropriate cushion. Dynamic pressure monitoring allows the pattern of pressure variation to be determined and hence the potential effectiveness of the cushion.

摘要

降低坐骨结节上方组织所产生的压力是预测坐垫有效性的一项重要措施。特别是,压力-时间关系对于预防压疮具有重要意义。在本研究中,使用了一种动态压力监测系统来获取25名脊髓损伤受试者的压力-时间曲线。每位受试者对三种类型的坐垫(泡沫坐垫、凝胶坐垫(阿伯丁款)和罗霍坐垫)进行测试,每次测试两小时,期间进行日常活动。所获得的结果与先前的研究大致可比。平均压力分别为:泡沫坐垫87.6mmHg(11.6kPa);凝胶坐垫68.6mmHg(9kPa);罗霍坐垫54.6mmHg(6.7kPa)。给出了每种坐垫三位受试者的压力-时间直方图。这些图显示了同一坐垫上受试者之间的变异性以及不同坐垫上受试者内部的变异性。因此,个体患者评估对于提供最合适的坐垫很重要。动态压力监测可以确定压力变化模式,从而确定坐垫的潜在有效性。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of cushions using dynamic pressure measurement.使用动态压力测量评估垫子。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 1991 Dec;15(3):232-40. doi: 10.3109/03093649109164293.
2
Evaluation of an active seating system for pressure relief.一种用于减压的主动座椅系统的评估。
Assist Technol. 1995;7(2):119-28. doi: 10.1080/10400435.1995.10132260.
3
Wheelchair cushion modification and its effect on pressure.轮椅坐垫改良及其对压力的影响。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1984 Oct;65(10):579-83.
4
Seating pressures with conventional and dynamic wheelchair cushions in tetraplegia.四肢瘫痪患者使用传统轮椅坐垫和动态轮椅坐垫时的就坐压力。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 May;80(5):566-71. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90201-0.
5
Wheelchair cushions for spinal cord-injured individuals.用于脊髓损伤患者的轮椅坐垫。
Am J Occup Ther. 1985 Nov;39(11):722-5. doi: 10.5014/ajot.39.11.722.
6
Evaluation of pressure and durability of a low-cost wheelchair cushion designed for developing countries.针对为发展中国家设计的低成本轮椅坐垫的压力与耐用性评估。
Int J Rehabil Res. 2003 Jun;26(2):141-3. doi: 10.1097/00004356-200306000-00010.
7
Pressure distribution and skin temperature effect of the ROHO wheelchair balloon cushion.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1979 Feb;60(2):70-1.
8
Development and evaluation of a new contoured cushion system with an optimized normalization algorithm.一种具有优化归一化算法的新型轮廓垫系统的开发与评估。
Biomed Mater Eng. 2014;24(6):3427-38. doi: 10.3233/BME-141167.
9
Deep tissue loads in the seated buttocks on an off-loading wheelchair cushion versus air-cell-based and foam cushions: finite element studies.坐式卸压轮椅坐垫与气室垫和泡沫垫对臀部组织的深层压力:有限元研究。
Int Wound J. 2017 Dec;14(6):1327-1334. doi: 10.1111/iwj.12807. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
10
Hammocking: the effect of cushion covers on interface pressure measurements.悬吊:靠垫套对界面压力测量的影响。
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2006 Jan-Jun;1(1-2):141-4. doi: 10.1080/09638280500167647.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparing the interface pressure redistribution of three different types of cushions: differences according to age groups and cushion preferences.比较三种不同类型坐垫的界面压力再分布:按年龄组和坐垫偏好的差异
J Phys Ther Sci. 2017 Jan;29(1):57-63. doi: 10.1589/jpts.29.57. Epub 2017 Jan 30.
2
Reliability of the special support system for sitting pressure redistribution.坐姿压力再分布特殊支撑系统的可靠性。
J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Dec;28(12):3390-3392. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.3390. Epub 2016 Dec 27.
3
Effects of different seat cushions on interface pressure distribution: a pilot study.
不同座垫对界面压力分布的影响:一项初步研究。
J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Jan;28(1):227-30. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.227. Epub 2016 Jan 30.
4
Evidence-Based Strategies for Preserving Mobility for Elderly and Aging Manual Wheelchair Users.为老年及老龄手动轮椅使用者保持行动能力的循证策略
Top Geriatr Rehabil. 2015 Jan-Mar;31(1):26-41. doi: 10.1097/TGR.0000000000000042.
5
Pressure sores.压疮
West J Med. 1993 Apr;158(4):403-4.
6
Pressure sores.压疮
BMJ. 1994 Oct 1;309(6958):853-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.309.6958.853.