• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用推出试验设计对各种根管充填材料与根管牙本质之间的粘结强度进行体外比较。

An in vitro comparison of bond strength of various obturation materials to root canal dentin using a push-out test design.

作者信息

Fisher Matthew A, Berzins David W, Bahcall James K

机构信息

Department of Endodontics, Marquette University, School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA.

出版信息

J Endod. 2007 Jul;33(7):856-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.02.011. Epub 2007 Apr 16.

DOI:10.1016/j.joen.2007.02.011
PMID:17804329
Abstract

The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the bond strength of various obturation materials to root canal dentin by using a push-out test design. Twenty-five single-rooted extracted human teeth were used in this study. The crowns were removed, and root canal instrumentation was completed by using Endogel-coated 0.06 EndoSequence rotary files (Brasseler, Savannah, GA) and appropriate irrigation with 5.25% NaOCl and a final rinse with 17% EDTA. After instrumentation, the roots were randomly divided into five single-matched cone obturation groups (n = 5 roots/group), as follows: group 1, gutta percha with Kerr EWT (Kerr Corp, Romulus, MI); group 2, gutta percha with AH Plus (Dentsply, DeTrey, Germany); group 3, Resilon (Pentron Clinical Technologies, Wallingford, CT) and Epiphany (Pentron); group 4, Activ GP (Brasseler) obturation system; and group 5, EndoREZ obturation system (Ultradent, South Jordan, UT). The obturated roots were cut perpendicular to the long access to create 1-mm thick slices from the apical, middle, and coronal thirds. The bond strength was measured for each test slice with a push-out testing machine. Statistical analysis was completed by using a two-way analysis of variance and the post hoc Tukeys test with significance set at p < 0.05. Group 2 showed a significantly (p < 0.05) greater bond strength compared with all other groups. Also, groups 1 and 4 had significantly (p < 0.05) higher bond strengths compared with groups 3 and 5.

摘要

本体外研究的目的是通过推出试验设计比较各种根管充填材料与根管牙本质之间的粘结强度。本研究使用了25颗单根拔除的人牙。去除牙冠,使用涂有Endogel的0.06 EndoSequence旋转锉(Brasseler,佐治亚州萨凡纳)完成根管预备,并适当用5.25%次氯酸钠冲洗,最后用17%乙二胺四乙酸冲洗。预备后,将牙根随机分为五个单匹配牙胶尖充填组(每组n = 5个牙根),如下:第1组,牙胶尖与Kerr EWT(Kerr公司,密歇根州罗穆卢斯);第2组,牙胶尖与AH Plus(登士柏,德国德特雷);第3组,Resilon(Pentron临床技术公司,康涅狄格州沃灵福德)和Epiphany(Pentron);第4组,Activ GP(Brasseler)充填系统;第5组,EndoREZ充填系统(Ultradent,犹他州南乔丹)。将充填后的牙根垂直于长轴切割,从根尖、中部和冠部分别制作1毫米厚的切片。使用推出试验机测量每个测试切片的粘结强度。采用双向方差分析和事后Tukey检验进行统计分析,显著性设定为p < 0.05。与所有其他组相比,第2组显示出显著更高的粘结强度(p < 0.05)。此外,第1组和第4组的粘结强度显著高于第3组和第5组(p < 0.05)。

相似文献

1
An in vitro comparison of bond strength of various obturation materials to root canal dentin using a push-out test design.使用推出试验设计对各种根管充填材料与根管牙本质之间的粘结强度进行体外比较。
J Endod. 2007 Jul;33(7):856-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.02.011. Epub 2007 Apr 16.
2
Push-out bond strengths: the Epiphany-Resilon endodontic obturation system compared with different pairings of Epiphany, Resilon, AH Plus and gutta-percha.推出粘结强度:Epiphany-Resilon根管充填系统与Epiphany、Resilon、AH Plus和牙胶不同组合的比较。
Int Endod J. 2006 Aug;39(8):643-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2006.01132.x.
3
Influence of different root canal-filling materials on the mechanical properties of root canal dentin.不同根管充填材料对根管牙本质力学性能的影响。
J Endod. 2007 Jul;33(7):859-63. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.02.018. Epub 2007 Apr 16.
4
An in vitro comparison of the intraradicular dentin bond strength of Resilon and gutta-percha.Resilon与牙胶根管内牙本质粘结强度的体外比较。
J Endod. 2006 Oct;32(10):963-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.03.020. Epub 2006 Jul 3.
5
Comparison of push-out bond strengths of Resilon with three different sealers.比较 Resilon 与三种不同封闭剂的推出强度。
J Endod. 2010 Feb;36(2):318-21. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.10.026. Epub 2009 Dec 14.
6
Push-out bond strength of Resilon/Epiphany self-etch to intraradicular dentin after retreatment: a preliminary study.再治疗后 Resilon/Epiphany 自酸蚀黏结剂与根管内牙本质间的推出强度:初步研究。
J Endod. 2010 Mar;36(3):493-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2009.11.009. Epub 2010 Jan 25.
7
Push-out bond strength of a new endodontic obturation system (Resilon/Epiphany).一种新型根管充填系统(Resilon/Epiphany)的推出粘结强度。
J Endod. 2007 Feb;33(2):160-2. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2006.09.014. Epub 2006 Dec 20.
8
Effect of new obturating materials on vertical root fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth.新型充填材料对根管治疗后牙齿垂直根折抗力的影响。
J Endod. 2007 Jun;33(6):732-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.02.004. Epub 2007 Apr 16.
9
Push-out strength of root fillings with or without thermomechanical compaction.热牙胶垂直加压与侧压根管充填后根管内微渗漏的研究。
Int Endod J. 2012 Sep;45(9):821-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2012.02039.x. Epub 2012 Mar 28.
10
A novel polyurethane-based root canal-obturation material and urethane-acrylate-based root canal sealer-part 2: evaluation of push-out bond strengths.一种新型聚氨酯基根管充填材料和聚氨酯丙烯酸酯基根管封闭剂——第2部分:推出粘结强度评估
J Endod. 2008 May;34(5):594-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2008.02.015. Epub 2008 Mar 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of different root canal drying techniques on the push-out bond strength of ceraseal sealer - An study.不同根管干燥技术对赛瑞密封剂推出粘结强度的影响——一项研究。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Jul;28(7):642-646. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_211_25. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
2
Evaluation of the Bond Strength of Bioglass-Based Root Canal Filling Materials.基于生物玻璃的根管充填材料粘结强度评估
Acta Stomatol Croat. 2025 Jun;59(2):133-140. doi: 10.15644/asc59/2/3.
3
Bioceramic dressing and its influence on intratubular penetration and bond strength of endodontic sealers.
生物陶瓷敷料及其对根管封闭剂根管内渗透和粘结强度的影响。
J Clin Exp Dent. 2025 Jun 1;17(6):e627-e634. doi: 10.4317/jced.62609. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Intracanal reinforcement with direct composite buildup as an alternative to fiber posts: An analysis.采用直接复合树脂堆塑进行根管内增强作为纤维桩替代方法的分析
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 May;28(5):431-438. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_73_25. Epub 2025 May 6.
5
Physico-Chemical Properties and Push-Out Bond Strength to Root Dentine of Calcium Silicate-Based Sealers.硅酸钙类封闭剂的物理化学性质及其与牙根牙本质的推出粘结强度
J Funct Biomater. 2025 Apr 3;16(4):131. doi: 10.3390/jfb16040131.
6
Comparative evaluation of reinforcing effect of three different intra-orifice barriers on pericervical dentin of endodontically treated teeth: An study.三种不同根管口屏障对根管治疗后牙齿颈周牙本质增强效果的比较评价:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Dec;27(12):1276-1279. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_346_24. Epub 2024 Dec 10.
7
Comparative Analysis of Fracture Resistance of Endodontic Sealer Types and Filling Methods.根管封闭剂类型与充填方法的抗折性比较分析
Materials (Basel). 2024 Dec 26;18(1):40. doi: 10.3390/ma18010040.
8
Comparative Assessment of Push-Out Bond Strength and Dentinal Tubule Penetration of Different Calcium-Silicate-Based Endodontic Sealers.不同硅酸钙基根管封闭剂的推出粘结强度和牙本质小管渗透的比较评估
Dent J (Basel). 2024 Dec 6;12(12):397. doi: 10.3390/dj12120397.
9
Effect of crosslinking/antioxidant agents as final irrigant on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated root after radiotherapy.交联/抗氧化剂作为根管冲洗剂对放射治疗后根管治疗牙抗折性能的影响。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 17;19(10):e0311132. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311132. eCollection 2024.
10
Comparative Analysis of Interfacial Adaptation and Depth Penetration of Recent HiFlow versus Regular Bioceramic Sealers in Conjunction with BC Gutta-Percha Points Using Two Different Obturation Techniques-A Preliminary Report of an Ex Vivo Study.使用两种不同充填技术对近期的高流量生物陶瓷封闭剂与常规生物陶瓷封闭剂结合 BC 牙胶尖时的界面适应性和根尖孔深度的比较分析——一项体外研究的初步报告
J Funct Biomater. 2024 May 17;15(5):134. doi: 10.3390/jfb15050134.