• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不同根管干燥技术对赛瑞密封剂推出粘结强度的影响——一项研究。

Effect of different root canal drying techniques on the push-out bond strength of ceraseal sealer - An study.

作者信息

Pooja R Patil, Nirupama D N, Mohan Nainan Thomas, Vijay R, Thomas Helen, Sneha P K

机构信息

Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Vydehi Institute of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Jul;28(7):642-646. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_211_25. Epub 2025 Jul 2.

DOI:10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_211_25
PMID:40746472
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12310101/
Abstract

CONTEXT

Different levels of residual moisture in the root canal have shown to affect the sealing properties of resin-based and calcium silicate based sealers.

AIM

This study was aimed to compare the effect of different root canal drying techniques on the push-out bond strength (PBS) of AH Plus and Ceraseal sealer.

METHODOLOGY

Sixty-four single rooted premolars were decoronated and subjected to biomechanical preparation with a ProTaper Gold rotary file up to size F2 and were divided into two groups based on the type of sealer used: Group A: AH Plus, and Group B: Ceraseal. Each group was further subdivided into four subgroups based on the different drying techniques using paper point, ethanol, air vacuum, and control. Samples were obturated and were tested for PBS using the universal testing machine.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The data were statistically evaluated using the one-way ANOVA test and Tukey's test.

RESULTS

The ceraseal sealer group with drying technique using paper point was found to have the highest push-out strength, and the AH Plus sealer group (control) was found to have the lowest PBS.

CONCLUSION

Canal drying technique using paper point for the ceraseal sealer group and 95% ethanol for the AH Plus sealer group were found to have improved adhesion to the root dentin.

摘要

背景

根管内不同程度的残余水分已被证明会影响树脂基和硅酸钙基封闭剂的封闭性能。

目的

本研究旨在比较不同根管干燥技术对AH Plus和Ceraseal封闭剂推出粘结强度(PBS)的影响。

方法

64颗单根前磨牙去冠,使用ProTaper Gold旋转锉进行生物力学预备至F2号,根据所用封闭剂类型分为两组:A组:AH Plus,B组:Ceraseal。每组再根据使用纸尖、乙醇、空气抽吸和对照组的不同干燥技术进一步细分为四个亚组。样本进行充填,并使用万能试验机测试PBS。

统计分析

数据采用单因素方差分析和Tukey检验进行统计学评估。

结果

发现使用纸尖干燥技术的Ceraseal封闭剂组具有最高的推出强度,而AH Plus封闭剂组(对照组)的PBS最低。

结论

发现Ceraseal封闭剂组使用纸尖进行根管干燥技术,AH Plus封闭剂组使用95%乙醇,可提高对牙根牙本质的粘附力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e231/12310101/29c2426487d7/JCDE-28-642-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e231/12310101/29c2426487d7/JCDE-28-642-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e231/12310101/29c2426487d7/JCDE-28-642-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Effect of different root canal drying techniques on the push-out bond strength of ceraseal sealer - An study.不同根管干燥技术对赛瑞密封剂推出粘结强度的影响——一项研究。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Jul;28(7):642-646. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_211_25. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
2
Evaluation the impact of access cavity design and activation of calcium silicate-based sealer with EDDY and XP-Endo Finisher on sealer penetration into dentinal tubules: a confocal laser scanning microscopy study.评估窝洞设计以及使用EDDY和XP-Endo Finisher激活硅酸钙类封闭剂对封闭剂渗入牙本质小管的影响:一项共聚焦激光扫描显微镜研究。
Head Face Med. 2025 Jul 26;21(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s13005-025-00530-9.
3
Comparative evaluation of pushout bond strength of three different sealers: An study.三种不同封闭剂推出粘结强度的比较评估:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Jul;28(7):637-641. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_214_25. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
4
Different root canal drying protocols for AH Plus Bioceramic Sealer: An in vitro study.AH Plus生物陶瓷封闭剂不同的根管干燥方案:一项体外研究。
Eur J Oral Sci. 2025 Oct;133(5):e70028. doi: 10.1111/eos.70028. Epub 2025 Jul 2.
5
Evaluation of Apical Sealing Ability of a Calcium Silicate-Based Root Canal Sealer nRoot SP Using Different Obturation Techniques.使用不同充填技术评估硅酸钙基根管封闭剂nRoot SP的根尖封闭能力
Int Dent J. 2025 Jul 23;75(5):100916. doi: 10.1016/j.identj.2025.100916.
6
12 Months Results of Bond Strength and Endogenous Enzymatic Activity of Radicular Dentin Obturated With Bioceramic Sealer.生物陶瓷封闭剂充填根管牙本质的粘结强度和内源性酶活性的12个月结果
J Adhes Dent. 2025 Jul 1;27:145-153. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.c_2128.
7
Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Roots Obturated with Three Different Sealers and Three Various Obturation Techniques.三种不同封闭剂和三种不同充填技术对根管充填后牙根抗折性的评估
Eur Endod J. 2025 Jul;10(4):326-332. doi: 10.14744/eej.2025.85866.
8
Resistance of gutta-percha and calcium silicate-based sealer to dislocation after non-surgical root canal retreatment.非手术根管再治疗后牙胶尖和硅酸钙类封闭剂的抗脱位性
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 5;25(1):1112. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06455-8.
9
The Impact of Calcium Silicate-Based and Resin-Based Root Canal Sealers on Postoperative Pain and Sealer Extrusion: A Multicenter Randomized Clinical Study.硅酸钙类和树脂类根管封闭剂对术后疼痛及封闭剂挤出的影响:一项多中心随机临床研究
J Endod. 2025 Jul 11. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2025.07.004.
10
An Comparative Evaluation of Three Different Solvents in the Retreatment of Teeth Obturated using Bioceramic Sealer.三种不同溶剂对使用生物陶瓷封闭剂充填的牙齿进行再治疗的比较评价
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2025 Apr 1;26(4):403-408. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-3860.

本文引用的文献

1
Comparative evaluation of the effect of nitrofurantoin and triple antibiotic paste on the push-out bond strength of epoxy resin sealer: An study.呋喃妥因与三联抗生素糊剂对环氧树脂封闭剂推出粘结强度影响的比较评估:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2025 Feb;28(2):187-192. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_795_24. Epub 2025 Feb 3.
2
Comparative evaluation of the effect of three different obturation techniques on push-out bond strength of AH Plus Bioceramic and EndoCeramic sealers: An study.三种不同充填技术对AH Plus生物陶瓷封闭剂和EndoCeramic封闭剂推出粘结强度影响的比较评价:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Oct;27(10):1026-1031. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_345_24. Epub 2024 Oct 5.
3
Comparative evaluation of push-out bond strength and mode of failure of three different obturating materials: An study.
三种不同充填材料推出粘结强度及失败模式的比较评估:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Jun;27(6):608-612. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_186_24. Epub 2024 Jun 6.
4
Evaluation of different mechanical cleaning protocols associated with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite in the removal of residues from the post space.评估与2.5%次氯酸钠相关的不同机械清洁方案对根管桩道内残留物的去除效果。
J Conserv Dent Endod. 2024 Mar;27(3):274-279. doi: 10.4103/JCDE.JCDE_324_23. Epub 2024 Mar 6.
5
Evaluation of push-out bond strength, dentinal tubule penetration and adhesive pattern of bio-ceramic and epoxy resin-based root canal sealers.评价生物陶瓷和环氧树脂基根管封闭剂的推出强度、牙本质小管渗透和粘结模式。
PLoS One. 2023 Nov 13;18(11):e0294076. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294076. eCollection 2023.
6
Canal Drying Protocols to Use with Calcium Silicate-based Sealer: Effect on Bond Strength and Adhesive Interface.钙硅基密封剂用根管干燥方案:对粘结强度和粘结界面的影响。
J Endod. 2023 Sep;49(9):1154-1160. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2023.07.015. Epub 2023 Jul 28.
7
Comparison of push-out bond strength of endodontic sealers after root canal drying with different techniques.不同根管干燥技术对牙胶密封剂后推出力影响的比较。
Clin Exp Dent Res. 2023 Apr;9(2):314-321. doi: 10.1002/cre2.720. Epub 2023 Feb 19.
8
Effect of different dentin moisture on the push-out strength of bioceramic root canal sealer.不同牙本质湿度对生物陶瓷根管封闭剂推出强度的影响。
J Dent Sci. 2023 Jan;18(1):129-134. doi: 10.1016/j.jds.2022.06.025. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
9
Evaluation of push-out bond strength of BioRoot RCS and AH Plus after using different irrigants: An study.使用不同冲洗剂后BioRoot RCS和AH Plus的推出粘结强度评估:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2020 Jan-Feb;23(1):26-31. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_223_20. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
10
Physicochemical and Antibacterial Properties of Novel, Premixed Calcium Silicate-Based Sealer Compared to Powder-Liquid Bioceramic Sealer.新型预混硅酸钙基封闭剂与粉液型生物陶瓷封闭剂相比的物理化学和抗菌性能
J Clin Med. 2020 Sep 25;9(10):3096. doi: 10.3390/jcm9103096.