文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

Integrative analysis of genomic aberrations associated with prostate cancer progression.

作者信息

Kim Jung H, Dhanasekaran Saravana M, Mehra Rohit, Tomlins Scott A, Gu Wenjuan, Yu Jianjun, Kumar-Sinha Chandan, Cao Xuhong, Dash Atreya, Wang Lei, Ghosh Debashis, Shedden Kerby, Montie James E, Rubin Mark A, Pienta Kenneth J, Shah Rajal B, Chinnaiyan Arul M

机构信息

Michigan Center for Translational Pathology, Department of Pathology, Department of Urology, Program of Bioinformatics, and Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0940, USA.

出版信息

Cancer Res. 2007 Sep 1;67(17):8229-39. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1297.


DOI:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-1297
PMID:17804737
Abstract

Integrative analysis of genomic aberrations in the context of trancriptomic alterations will lead to a more comprehensive perspective on prostate cancer progression. Genome-wide copy number changes were monitored using array comparative genomic hybridization of laser-capture microdissected prostate cancer samples spanning stages of prostate cancer progression, including precursor lesions, clinically localized disease, and metastatic disease. A total of 62 specific cell populations from 38 patients were profiled. Minimal common regions (MCR) of alterations were defined for each sample type, and metastatic samples displayed the most number of alterations. Clinically localized prostate cancer samples with high Gleason grade resembled metastatic samples with respect to the size of altered regions and number of affected genes. A total of 9 out of 13 MCRs in the putative precursor lesion, high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN), showed an overlap with prostate cancer cases (amplifications in 3q29, 5q31.3-q32, 6q27, and 8q24.3 and deletions in 6q22.31, 16p12.2, 17q21.2, and 17q21.31), whereas postatrophic hyperplasia (PAH) did not exhibit this overlap. Interestingly, prostate cancers that do not overexpress ETS family members (i.e., gene fusion-negative prostate cancers) harbor differential aberrations in 1q23, 6q16, 6q21, 10q23, and 10q24. Integrative analysis with matched mRNA profiles identified genetic alterations in several proposed candidate genes implicated in prostate cancer progression.

摘要

相似文献

[1]
Integrative analysis of genomic aberrations associated with prostate cancer progression.

Cancer Res. 2007-9-1

[2]
Detection of chromosomal anomalies and c-myc gene amplification in the cribriform pattern of prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and carcinoma by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Mod Pathol. 1997-11

[3]
Minimum altered regions in early prostate cancer progression identified by high resolution whole genome tiling path BAC array comparative hybridization.

Prostate. 2009-6-15

[4]
Epigenetic heterogeneity of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: clues for clonal progression in prostate carcinogenesis.

Mol Cancer Res. 2006-1

[5]
Detection of c-myc oncogene amplification and chromosomal anomalies in metastatic prostatic carcinoma by fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Cancer Res. 1997-2-1

[6]
High-grade prostate intraepithelial neoplasia shares cytogenetic alterations with invasive prostate cancer.

Prostate. 2001-4

[7]
Decreased NKX3.1 protein expression in focal prostatic atrophy, prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, and adenocarcinoma: association with gleason score and chromosome 8p deletion.

Cancer Res. 2006-11-15

[8]
High-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization of chromosome arm 8q: evaluation of genetic progression markers for prostate cancer.

Genes Chromosomes Cancer. 2005-12

[9]
Allelotyping analysis at chromosome 13q of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and clinically insignificant and significant prostate cancers.

Prostate. 2006-3-1

[10]
Simultaneously detection of genomic and expression alterations in prostate cancer using cDNA microarray.

Prostate. 2008-10-1

引用本文的文献

[1]
Cell division cycle 20 promotes tumor progression and predicts poor clinical outcome in childhood and adult adrenocortical carcinoma.

J Clin Transl Endocrinol. 2025-7-2

[2]
A novel role for Neurog2 in MYCN driven neuroendocrine plasticity of prostate cancer.

Oncogene. 2025-4-29

[3]
Prostate Cancer Progression Modeling Provides Insight into Dynamic Molecular Changes Associated with Progressive Disease States.

Cancer Res Commun. 2024-10-1

[4]
promotes oncogenesis and lethal progression of prostate cancer.

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024-9-3

[5]
Molecular functions of MCM8 and MCM9 and their associated pathologies.

iScience. 2023-4-27

[6]
A Drug Repurposing Screen Identifies Fludarabine Phosphate as a Potential Therapeutic Agent for N-MYC Overexpressing Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancers.

Cells. 2022-7-20

[7]
A Concise Review of MicroRNA-383: Exploring the Insights of Its Function in Tumorigenesis.

J Cancer. 2022-1-1

[8]
Motifs of the C-terminal domain of MCM9 direct localization to sites of mitomycin-C damage for RAD51 recruitment.

J Biol Chem. 2021

[9]
The FABP12/PPARγ pathway promotes metastatic transformation by inducing epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and lipid-derived energy production in prostate cancer cells.

Mol Oncol. 2020-12

[10]
Loss of CHD1 Promotes Heterogeneous Mechanisms of Resistance to AR-Targeted Therapy via Chromatin Dysregulation.

Cancer Cell. 2020-3-26

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索