Jun Byoung Sun, Kim Kyung Min, Yang Hyun Ju, Park Joon Hyuk
Jun's Psychiatric Clinic, Samcheok, Republic of Korea.
Department of Neuropsychiatry, Naju National Hospital, Naju, Republic of Korea.
Psychiatry Investig. 2023 Dec;20(12):1126-1132. doi: 10.30773/pi.2023.0092. Epub 2023 Dec 18.
Although the Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) scale was originally developed to stage Alzheimer's dementia (AD), it is now used globally for various types of dementia. The aim of this study was to investigate the characteristic pattern of CDR domains and its association with neuropsychological findings and activities of daily living (ADL) in patients with vascular dementia (VaD) and patients with AD.
We recruited very mild to mild VaD and AD patients who were age-matched among the first visitors to a dementia clinic. All subjects underwent a standardized clinical interview, physical and neurological examinations, and laboratory tests, including brain magnetic resonance imaging, according to the protocol of the Korean version of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's Disease assessment battery.
A total of 105 pairs of VaD and AD patients participated in this study. Although the adjusted scores on Korean version of the Mini-Mental State Examination were similar between the two groups, the VaD patients performed better on the Boston Naming Test, Word List Memory, Word List Recall, Word List Recognition, and Constructional Recall Test. However, the scores on global CDR, CDR sum of boxes, and ADL-related CDR domains were higher in VaD patients than in AD patients (p<0.001). The VaD patients also showed poor performances on the Disability Assessment for Dementia Scale, Frontal Assessment Battery, Executive Clock Drawing Task, and Stroop tests.
Despite similar general cognitive function and better memory function, patients with VaD tend to be staged as severer dementia on the CDR scale than patients with AD because of more impaired ADL associated with executive dysfunction.
尽管临床痴呆评定量表(CDR)最初是为阿尔茨海默病性痴呆(AD)的分期而制定的,但目前在全球范围内用于各种类型的痴呆。本研究的目的是调查血管性痴呆(VaD)患者和AD患者CDR各领域的特征模式及其与神经心理学检查结果和日常生活活动(ADL)的关系。
我们招募了首次到痴呆门诊就诊的年龄匹配的极轻度至轻度VaD和AD患者。所有受试者均按照韩国版阿尔茨海默病注册协会评估量表的方案,接受标准化的临床访谈、体格和神经系统检查以及实验室检查,包括脑磁共振成像。
共有105对VaD和AD患者参与了本研究。尽管两组之间韩国版简易精神状态检查表的校正分数相似,但VaD患者在波士顿命名测试、单词表记忆、单词表回忆、单词表识别和构图回忆测试中的表现更好。然而,VaD患者的总体CDR、CDR方框总和以及与ADL相关的CDR领域得分高于AD患者(p<0.001)。VaD患者在痴呆残疾评估量表、额叶评估量表、执行时钟绘图任务和斯特鲁普测试中的表现也较差。
尽管VaD患者和AD患者的一般认知功能相似且VaD患者的记忆功能更好,但由于与执行功能障碍相关的ADL受损更严重,VaD患者在CDR量表上的痴呆分期往往比AD患者更严重。