Fink Max, Rush A John, Knapp Rebecca, Rasmussen Keith, Mueller Martina, Rummans Teresa A, O'Connor Kevin, Husain Mustafa, Biggs Melanie, Bailine Samuel, Kellner Charles H
Zucker Hillside Hospital, North Shore-Long Island Jewish Health Systems, Glen Oaks, NY, USA.
J ECT. 2007 Sep;23(3):139-46. doi: 10.1097/yct.0b013e3180337344.
To determine the relationship between baseline melancholic features with outcomes in patients with major depressive disorder referred for electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).
In a multihospital (Consortium for Research in ECT) collaborative ECT study, SCID-1 interviews were obtained at study entry. Ratings of the 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression were obtained thrice weekly during the course of ECT, once during a subsequent treatment-free week, and periodically during 6-month continuation treatment with either bitemporal ECT or nortriptyline plus lithium (continuation pharmacotherapy).
The evaluable sample was severely ill with a mean 24-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression score of 35.2 (+/-6.9). Of 489 patients, 63.6% (311) met DSM-IV criteria for melancholic features. During acute ECT, 62.1% of those with melancholic features remitted, as compared with 78.7% for those without melancholic features (P = 0.002). During medication continuation treatment (continuation pharmacotherapy), relapse rates were higher for those with melancholic features than for those without these features. Conversely, with continuation ECT, the rate of relapse was lower for those with, compared with those without, melancholic features.
Ascertaining melancholic features by SCID-1 criteria does not identify depressed patients more likely to respond to ECT as had been anticipated from the literature. Melancholic features were associated with poorer treatment outcomes in acute ECT. Those with melancholic features were less likely to relapse with continuation ECT, but those with melancholic features were more likely to relapse with continuation pharmacotherapy. The limitations of the DSM-IV criteria for melancholia are discussed.
确定接受电休克治疗(ECT)的重度抑郁症患者的基线抑郁特征与治疗结果之间的关系。
在一项多中心(ECT研究联盟)合作的ECT研究中,在研究开始时进行了SCID-Ⅰ访谈。在ECT治疗期间,每周三次获取24项汉密尔顿抑郁量表评分,在随后的一个无治疗周获取一次评分,并在为期6个月的双颞叶ECT或去甲替林加锂(持续药物治疗)的持续治疗期间定期获取评分。
可评估样本病情严重,24项汉密尔顿抑郁量表平均评分为35.2(±6.9)。在489例患者中,63.6%(311例)符合DSM-Ⅳ中抑郁特征的标准。在急性ECT治疗期间,有抑郁特征的患者中62.1%病情缓解,而无抑郁特征者为78.7%(P = 0.002)。在药物持续治疗(持续药物治疗)期间,有抑郁特征者的复发率高于无抑郁特征者。相反,在持续ECT治疗中,有抑郁特征者的复发率低于无抑郁特征者。
按照SCID-Ⅰ标准确定抑郁特征并不能像文献预期的那样识别出更可能对ECT有反应的抑郁症患者。抑郁特征与急性ECT治疗效果较差有关。有抑郁特征者接受持续ECT治疗时复发可能性较小,但接受持续药物治疗时复发可能性较大。文中讨论了DSM-Ⅳ中抑郁标准的局限性。