Sirovskiĭ E B, Amcheslavskiĭ V G, Kulikovskiĭ V P, Tenedieva V D, Lobanov S A, Polonskaia M E, Pokid'ko Iu N
Vestn Akad Med Nauk SSSR. 1991(7):7-13.
As many as 120 neurosurgical patients were examined after the excision of hemispheric gliomas, basal and subtentorial tumors. Based on an the computer-aided analysis biochemical and clinical data, attempts have been made to unify the mechanisms responsible for brain edema development in patients with neurosurgical pathology. In the early postoperative period, brain edema occurs in 95% of neurosurgical patients. Edema development, spreading and intensity depend on the site and nature of the primary pathological focus as well as on traumatism of surgical interventions. It is proved that edema is an original, biologically expedient brain response to its injury. This response manifests in hyperhydration of all tissues, with the maximum intensity being concentrated in the focus of injury. Specific (neurogenic neurohumoral) and nonspecific (biochemical, autoimmune, mechanical, and so forth) factors of brain edema development may be distinguished. The differences in the neurogenic and neurohumoral mechanisms by which brain edema develops may be accounted for by the topography of the focus of injury. The closer the pathological focus is to the stem and diencephalic structures, the more remarkable the action of neurogenous and neurohumoral factors and the more distinct the tendency toward edema generalization are. At the diencephalic level of injury, damaged are the structures responsible for central regulation of metabolism and trophicity of nerve cells. The neurogenously precipitated diffuse impairment of permeability of the cells entails their hyperhydration, which marks cellular (cytotoxic) edema. The subtentorial process that affects the vasomotor centre of the stem triggers the neurogenic diffuse alterations in the vascular tone, manifesting in an increase of permeability for water and plasma proteins which is characteristic of vasogenic edema.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
多达120例神经外科患者在切除半球胶质瘤、颅底肿瘤和幕下肿瘤后接受了检查。基于计算机辅助分析生化和临床数据,已尝试统一神经外科病理患者脑水肿发生的机制。在术后早期,95%的神经外科患者会出现脑水肿。水肿的发生、扩散和强度取决于原发性病理灶的部位和性质以及手术干预的创伤程度。已证实水肿是大脑对其损伤的一种原始的、具有生物学适应性的反应。这种反应表现为所有组织的水分过多,最大强度集中在损伤部位。可以区分脑水肿发生的特异性(神经源性神经体液)和非特异性(生化、自身免疫、机械等)因素。脑水肿发生的神经源性和神经体液机制的差异可能由损伤部位的地形学来解释。病理灶离脑干和间脑结构越近,神经源性和神经体液因素的作用就越显著,水肿泛化的趋势也就越明显。在间脑损伤水平,负责神经细胞代谢和营养中枢调节的结构受到损害。神经源性引发的细胞通透性弥漫性损害导致细胞水分过多,这标志着细胞(细胞毒性)水肿。影响脑干血管运动中枢的幕下病变引发血管张力的神经源性弥漫性改变,表现为水和血浆蛋白通透性增加,这是血管源性水肿的特征。(摘要截断于250字)