Server A, Kulle B, Maehlen J, Josefsen R, Schellhorn T, Kumar T, Langberg C W, Nakstad P H
Department of Neuroradiology, Division of Radiology, Ullevaal University Hospital, University of Oslo, Kirkeveien 166, Oslo, Norway.
Acta Radiol. 2009 Jul;50(6):682-9. doi: 10.1080/02841850902933123.
Conventional magnetic resonance (MR) imaging has a number of limitations in the diagnosis of the most common intracranial brain tumors, including tumor specification and the detection of tumoral infiltration in regions of peritumoral edema.
To prospectively assess if diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) could be used to differentiate between different types of brain tumors and to distinguish between peritumoral infiltration in high-grade gliomas, lymphomas, and pure vasogenic edema in metastases and meningiomas.
MR imaging and DWI was performed on 93 patients with newly diagnosed brain tumors: 59 patients had histologically verified high-grade gliomas (37 glioblastomas multiforme, 22 anaplastic astrocytomas), 23 patients had metastatic brain tumors, five patients had primary cerebral lymphomas, and six patients had meningiomas. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values of tumor (enhancing regions or the solid portion of tumor) and peritumoral edema, and ADC ratios (ADC of tumor or peritumoral edema to ADC of contralateral white matter, ADC of tumor to ADC of peritumoral edema) were compared with the histologic diagnosis. ADC values and ratios of high-grade gliomas, primary cerebral lymphomas, metastases, and meningiomas were compared by using ANOVA and multiple comparisons. Optimal thresholds of ADC values and ADC ratios for distinguishing high-grade gliomas from metastases were determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis.
Statistically significant differences were found for minimum and mean of ADC tumor and ADC tumor ratio values between metastases and high-grade gliomas when including only one factor at a time. Including a combination of in total four parameters (mean ADC tumor, and minimum, maximum and mean ADC tumor ratio) resulted in sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV), and negative predictive values (NPV) of 72.9, 82.6, 91.5, and 54.3% respectively. In the ROC curve analysis, the area under the curve of the combined four parameters was the largest (0.84), indicating a good test.
Our results suggest that ADC values and ADC ratios (minimum and mean of ADC tumor and ADC tumor ratio) may be helpful in the differentiation of metastases from high-grade gliomas. It cannot distinguish high-grade gliomas from lymphomas, and lymphomas from metastases. ADC values and ADC ratios in peritumoral edema cannot be used to differentiate edema with infiltration of tumor cells from vasogenic edema when measurements for high-grade gliomas, lymphomas, metastases, and meningiomas were compared.
传统磁共振(MR)成像在诊断最常见的颅内脑肿瘤时存在诸多局限性,包括肿瘤的鉴别以及肿瘤周围水肿区域肿瘤浸润的检测。
前瞻性评估扩散加权磁共振成像(DWI)是否可用于区分不同类型的脑肿瘤,以及区分高级别胶质瘤中的肿瘤周围浸润、淋巴瘤,与转移瘤和脑膜瘤中的单纯血管源性水肿。
对93例新诊断脑肿瘤患者进行了MR成像和DWI检查:59例患者经组织学证实为高级别胶质瘤(37例多形性胶质母细胞瘤,22例间变性星形细胞瘤),23例患者为脑转移瘤,5例患者为原发性脑淋巴瘤,6例患者为脑膜瘤。将肿瘤(强化区域或肿瘤实体部分)和肿瘤周围水肿的表观扩散系数(ADC)值,以及ADC比率(肿瘤或肿瘤周围水肿的ADC与对侧白质ADC的比值、肿瘤ADC与肿瘤周围水肿ADC的比值)与组织学诊断结果进行比较。采用方差分析和多重比较对高级别胶质瘤、原发性脑淋巴瘤、转移瘤和脑膜瘤的ADC值及比率进行比较。通过受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线分析确定区分高级别胶质瘤与转移瘤的ADC值和ADC比率的最佳阈值。
每次仅纳入一个因素时,转移瘤与高级别胶质瘤之间在ADC肿瘤最小值、平均值及ADC肿瘤比率值方面存在统计学显著差异。纳入总共四个参数(ADC肿瘤平均值以及ADC肿瘤比率的最小值、最大值和平均值)的组合后,敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值(PPV)和阴性预测值(NPV)分别为72.9%、82.6%、91.5%和54.3%。在ROC曲线分析中,四个参数组合的曲线下面积最大(0.84),表明该检测效果良好。
我们的结果表明,ADC值和ADC比率(ADC肿瘤的最小值和平均值以及ADC肿瘤比率)可能有助于区分转移瘤与高级别胶质瘤。它无法区分高级别胶质瘤与淋巴瘤,也无法区分淋巴瘤与转移瘤。在比较高级别胶质瘤、淋巴瘤、转移瘤和脑膜瘤的测量结果时,肿瘤周围水肿的ADC值和ADC比率不能用于区分肿瘤细胞浸润性水肿与血管源性水肿。