Dingle H
Science. 1972 Mar 24;175(4028):1327-35. doi: 10.1126/science.175.4028.1327.
Physiological and ecological results from a variety of species are consistent with what seem to be valid general statements concerning insect migration. These are as follows: (i)During migration locomotory functions are enhanced and vegetative functions such as feeding and reproduction are suppressed. (ii) Migration usually occurs prereproductively in the life of the adult insect (the oogenesis-flight syndrome). (iii)Since migrant individuals are usually prereproductive, their reproductive values, and hence colonizing abilities, are at or near maximum. (iv) Migrants usually reside in temporary habitats. (v)Migrants have a high potential for population increase, r, which is also advantageous for colonizers. (vi)Both the physiological and ecological parameters of migration are modifiable by environmental factors (that is, phenotypically modifiable)to suit the prevailing conditions. Taken together, these criteria establish a comprehensive theory and adumbrate the basic strategy for migrant insects. This basic strategy is modified to suit the ecological requirements of individual species. Comparative studies of these modifications are of considerable theoretical and practical interest, the more so since most economically important insects are migrants. No satisfactory general statements can as yet be made with respect to the genotype and migration. Certainly we expect colonizing populiations to possess genotypes favoring a high r, but genotypic variation in r depends on the heritabilities of life table statistics, and such measurements are yet to be made (10, 53). The fact that flight duration can be increased by appropriate selection in Oncopeltus fasciatus, and the demonstration of additive genetic variance for this trait in Lygaeus kalmii, suggest that heritability studies of migratory behavior would also be worth pursuing. Most interesting of course, will be possible genetic correlations between migration and life history parameters. Also, migration often transports genotypes across long distances with considerable mixing of populations. An understanding of its operation therefore carries with it implications for population genetics, zoogeography, and evolutionary theory. Finally, at least parts of the above general theory would seem to be applicable to forms other than insects. Bird and insect migrations, for example, are in many respects ecologically and physiologically similar. Birds, like insects, emphasize locomotory. as opposed to vegetative functions during long-distance flight; the well-known Zugenruhe or migratory restlessness is a case in point. Further, many birds migrateat nigt at a time when they would ordinarily roost(vegetative activity). Because their life spans exceed single seasons, bird migrants are not prereproductive in the same sense that insect migrants are, and hence reproductive values do not have the same meaning(but note that some insects are also interreproductive migrants). The situaion is complicated further by the fact that in many birds adult survivorship is virtually independent of age so that colonizing ability tends to be also (10, 54). Nevertheless, birds arrive on their nesting grounds in reproductive condition with the result that migration is a colonizing episode. It is also phenotypically modifiable by environmental factors, some of which, for example, photoperiod, influence insects as well (55). The similarities between birds and insects thus seem sufficient to indicate, at least provisionally, that the theory developed for insects applies also to birds with appropriate modifications for longer life span and more complex social behavior; comparisons between insects and fish (56) lead to the same conclusion. In birds especially, and also in other forms, various functions accessory to migration such as reproductive endocrinology, energy budgets, and orientation mechanisms have been studied extensively (55, 56). But there is need in vertebrates for more data andtheoy on the ecology and physiology of migratory behavior per se in order tobetter understand its evolution and its role in ecosystem function (5, 57). Migration in any animal cannot be understood until viewed in its entirety as a physiological, behavioral, and ecological syndrome.
来自各种物种的生理和生态结果与关于昆虫迁徙的似乎有效的一般性陈述一致。如下所述:(i)在迁徙过程中,运动功能增强,而诸如取食和繁殖等营养功能受到抑制。(ii)迁徙通常发生在成年昆虫生命中的生殖前期(卵子发生 - 飞行综合征)。(iii)由于迁徙个体通常处于生殖前期,它们的生殖价值,进而其定殖能力,处于或接近最大值。(iv)迁徙者通常栖息在临时栖息地。(v)迁徙者具有较高的种群增长潜力r,这对定殖者也有利。(vi)迁徙的生理和生态参数均可被环境因素改变(即表型可改变)以适应当前条件。综上所述,这些标准建立了一个综合理论,并勾勒出迁徙昆虫的基本策略。这种基本策略会根据个别物种的生态需求进行调整。对这些调整的比较研究具有相当大的理论和实际意义,特别是因为大多数具有经济重要性的昆虫都是迁徙者。关于基因型和迁徙,目前还无法做出令人满意的一般性陈述。当然,我们期望定殖种群拥有有利于高r值的基因型,但r值的基因型变异取决于生命表统计数据的遗传力,而此类测量尚未进行(参考文献10, 53)。在黄粉虫中通过适当选择可以增加飞行持续时间,并且在角盾蝽中证明了该性状的加性遗传方差,这表明对迁徙行为的遗传力研究也值得进行。当然,最有趣的将是迁徙与生活史参数之间可能的遗传相关性。此外,迁徙常常将基因型远距离运输,导致种群大量混合。因此,对其运作的理解对种群遗传学、动物地理学和进化理论都有影响。最后,上述一般理论的至少部分内容似乎也适用于昆虫以外的其他生物形式。例如,鸟类和昆虫的迁徙在许多方面在生态和生理上是相似的。鸟类与昆虫一样,在长途飞行中强调运动功能,而不是营养功能;著名的迁徙不安或迁徙性躁动就是一个例子。此外,许多鸟类在夜间迁徙,而此时它们通常会栖息(营养活动)。由于它们的寿命超过单个季节,鸟类迁徙者与昆虫迁徙者在相同意义上并非处于生殖前期,因此生殖价值并不具有相同含义(但请注意,一些昆虫也是跨生殖期的迁徙者)。由于在许多鸟类中成年存活率实际上与年龄无关,所以定殖能力也往往如此(参考文献10, 54),这使得情况更加复杂。然而,鸟类到达其筑巢地时处于生殖状态,结果是迁徙是一个定殖过程。它在表型上也可被环境因素改变,例如光周期等环境因素也会影响昆虫(参考文献55)。因此,鸟类和昆虫之间的相似性似乎足以至少暂时表明,为昆虫发展的理论经过适当修改后也适用于鸟类,以适应更长的寿命和更复杂的社会行为;昆虫与鱼类之间的比较(参考文献56)也得出相同结论。特别是在鸟类以及其他生物形式中,已经广泛研究了与迁徙相关的各种功能,如生殖内分泌学、能量预算和定向机制(参考文献55, 56)。但是,为了更好地理解迁徙行为的进化及其在生态系统功能中的作用,脊椎动物需要更多关于迁徙行为本身的生态和生理学的数据及理论(参考文献5, 57)。只有将任何动物的迁徙视为一种生理、行为和生态综合征,才能全面理解它。