Mayberry J C, Moneta G L, DeFrang R D, Porter J M
Department of Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland 97201.
J Vasc Surg. 1991 Jan;13(1):91-9; discussion 99-100. doi: 10.1067/mva.1991.25386.
To determine the effect of elastic compression stockings on deep venous hemodynamics we measured ambulatory venous pressure, venous refill time, maximum venous pressure with exercise, amplitude of venous pressure excursion, and duplex-derived common femoral and popliteal vein diameter and peak flow velocities with and without stockings in 10 healthy subjects and 16 patients with chronic deep venous insufficiency. The effects of below-knee and above-knee 30 to 40 torr and 40 to 50 torr gradient stockings were studied. Despite documentation of substantial stocking compressive effects by skin pressure measurements, neither below-knee or above-knee elastic compression stockings significantly improved ambulatory venous pressure, venous refill time, maximum venous pressure with exercise, or the amplitude of venous pressure excursion in healthy patients or in patients with deep venous insufficiency (p greater than 0.05). In patients with deep venous insufficiency stockings modestly increased popliteal vein diameter and flow velocity in the upright resting position (p less than 0.02). After tiptoe exercise without stockings deep venous peak flow velocity increased in healthy patients and in patients with deep venous insufficiency by a mean of 103% in the popliteal vein and 46% in the common femoral vein (p less than 0.01). With the application of elastic compression stockings only modest augmentation of deep venous flow velocity occurred in both groups above that seen in the bare leg after exercise. Thus elastic compression stockings did not improve deep venous hemodynamic measurements in patients with deep venous insufficiency. The beneficial effects of stockings in the treatment of deep venous insufficiency must relate to effects other than changes in deep venous hemodynamics.
为了确定弹性压迫袜对深静脉血流动力学的影响,我们在10名健康受试者和16名慢性深静脉功能不全患者中测量了动态静脉压、静脉再充盈时间、运动时的最大静脉压、静脉压波动幅度,以及在穿袜和不穿袜情况下通过双功超声获得的股总静脉和腘静脉直径及峰值流速。研究了膝下和膝上30至40托以及40至50托梯度压迫袜的效果。尽管通过皮肤压力测量证明了压迫袜有显著的压迫效果,但膝下或膝上弹性压迫袜均未显著改善健康患者或深静脉功能不全患者的动态静脉压、静脉再充盈时间、运动时的最大静脉压或静脉压波动幅度(p大于0.05)。在深静脉功能不全患者中,压迫袜在直立休息位时适度增加了腘静脉直径和流速(p小于0.02)。在不穿袜进行踮脚尖运动后,健康患者和深静脉功能不全患者的深静脉峰值流速在腘静脉平均增加了103%,在股总静脉平均增加了46%(p小于0.01)。在应用弹性压迫袜后,两组的深静脉流速仅比运动后裸腿时略有增加。因此,弹性压迫袜并未改善深静脉功能不全患者的深静脉血流动力学测量结果。压迫袜在治疗深静脉功能不全中的有益作用必定与深静脉血流动力学变化以外的其他作用有关。