Spence R K, Cahall E
Department of Surgery, Cooper Hospital/University, Medical Center, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School at Camden, N.J., USA.
J Vasc Surg. 1996 Nov;24(5):783-7. doi: 10.1016/s0741-5214(96)70013-7.
Compression of the lower extremity is the mainstay of therapy in patients who have chronic venous insufficiency. We evaluated the ability of two forms of compression-elastic stockings and an inelastic compression garment-with air plethysmography to determine how well they corrected abnormal deep venous hemodynamics in patients who had class III chronic venous insufficiency and how well this correction was sustained over time.
Patients had measurements taken with no compression, with a 30 to 40 mm Hg below-knee stocking, and with the inelastic compression garment 2 hours and 6 hours after donning the garments. Therapies were compared with baseline and with themselves over time.
Inelastic compression maintained limb size and reduced venous volume better than no compression or stockings over time (ankle circumference at 2 hr vs 6 hr: baseline, 24.7 +/- 7 cm vs 26.1 +/- 1.1 cm; stocking, 23.9 +/- 1.1 cm vs 26.2 +/- 1.2 cm; inelastic compression, 25.4 +/- 1.1 cm vs 25.4 +/- 0.9 cm; venous volume at 2 hr vs 6 hr: baseline, 97.5 +/- 14.1 ml vs 105.2 +/- 17.9 ml; stocking, 112.4 +/- 29.7 ml vs 77.5 +/- 13.2 ml; inelastic compression, 72.2 +/- 14.1 ml vs 56.1 +/- 10.2 ml). At 6 hours, the ejection fraction was increased and the venous filling index was significantly less with inelastic compression compared with the stocking and baseline (ejection fraction at 6 hr: baseline, 61.6% +/- 6.9%; stocking, 75.9% +/- 17.7%; inelastic compression, 78.8% +/- 12.2%).
Inelastic compression has a significant effect on deep venous hemodynamics by decreasing venous reflux and improving calf muscle pump function when compared with compression stockings, which may exert their primary effect on the superficial venous system.
对于患有慢性静脉功能不全的患者,下肢压迫是主要的治疗方法。我们使用空气体积描记法评估了两种压迫形式——弹性长袜和无弹性压迫衣——纠正Ⅲ级慢性静脉功能不全患者异常深静脉血流动力学的能力,以及这种纠正随时间的维持情况。
患者在未进行压迫、穿着30至40毫米汞柱的膝下长袜以及穿着无弹性压迫衣2小时和6小时后进行测量。将这些治疗方法随时间与基线以及它们自身进行比较。
随着时间推移,无弹性压迫比不进行压迫或穿着长袜能更好地维持肢体尺寸并减少静脉容量(2小时与6小时时的踝围:基线,24.7±7厘米对26.1±1.1厘米;长袜,23.9±1.1厘米对26.2±1.2厘米;无弹性压迫,25.4±1.1厘米对25.4±0.9厘米;2小时与6小时时的静脉容量:基线,97.5±14.1毫升对105.2±17.9毫升;长袜,112.4±29.7毫升对77.5±13.2毫升;无弹性压迫,72.2±14.1毫升对56.1±10.2毫升)。在6小时时,与长袜和基线相比,无弹性压迫使射血分数增加,静脉充盈指数显著降低(6小时时的射血分数:基线,61.6%±6.9%;长袜,75.9%±17.7%;无弹性压迫,78.8%±12.2%)。
与压迫长袜相比,无弹性压迫通过减少静脉反流和改善小腿肌肉泵功能,对深静脉血流动力学有显著影响,而压迫长袜可能主要作用于浅静脉系统。