Kirby Susannah, Becker Misha
Department of Linguistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, 27599-3155, USA.
J Child Lang. 2007 Aug;34(3):571-99. doi: 10.1017/s0305000907008045.
The purpose of this study was to determine the natural order of acquisition of the proform it, comparing deictic pronoun it, anaphoric pronoun it and expletive it. Files from four children (Adam, Eve, Nina and Peter) aged 1;6-3;0 in the CHILDES database were coded for occurrences of NP it (here it is) and expletive it (it's raining). Occurrences of NP it were coded for whether they followed an overt discourse anaphor (anaphoric it) or not (deictic it). All children examined produce deictic and anaphoric pronoun it from the very first files, but do not produce expletive it until 2-7 months later. Following Inoue's (1991) lexical-semantic reanalysis account of the acquisition of expletive there after locative there, we propose that children acquire expletive it by reanalyzing referential pronoun it to include an expletive subtype. This reanalysis takes place when children realize that expletive it never co-occurs with any deictic/anaphoric referent.
本研究的目的是确定指代形式“it”的自然习得顺序,比较指示代词“it”、回指代词“it”和虚义“it”。对儿童语言数据交换系统(CHILDES)数据库中4名年龄在1岁6个月至3岁的儿童(亚当、夏娃、尼娜和彼得)的文件进行编码,记录名词短语“it”(如“here it is”)和虚义“it”(如“it's raining”)的出现情况。对于名词短语“it”的出现情况,根据其是否紧跟显性语篇回指词(回指“it”)进行编码(指示“it”)。所有接受检查的儿童从最初的文件开始就产出指示代词和回指代词“it”,但直到2至7个月后才产出虚义“it”。继井上(1991)对方位词“there”之后虚义“there”习得的词汇语义重新分析解释之后,我们提出儿童通过将指示代词“it”重新分析以纳入虚义子类型来习得虚义“it”。当儿童意识到虚义“it”从不与任何指示/回指所指同时出现时,这种重新分析就会发生。