Chapman J Luke, Burgess John O, Holst Stefan, Sadan Avishai, Blatz Markus B
Department of Comprehensive Dentistry and Biomaterials, Louisiana State University, School of Dentistry, Baton Rouge, LA 70820, USA.
Quintessence Int. 2007 Sep;38(8):637-41.
To evaluate and compare shear bond strength of 3 self-etching bonding agents to enamel and dentin when the bonding agent is light cured before the application of resin composite or co-cured together with the resin composite.
One hundred twenty extracted teeth were wet ground to create a flat bonding area on enamel and dentin. Three bonding agents (Adper Prompt-L-Pop, Clearfil SE Bond, and Xeno III) were applied to either dentin or enamel according to the manufacturers' directions. In half of the specimens, bonding agents were light cured immediately after their application (Group PRC). The other half were not light cured until resin composite application (Group COC). Resin composite was placed into a Teflon tube and light cured over the adhesive. Specimens were stored in deionized water for 24 hours at room temperature before being loaded in shear until failure with an Instron testing machine. Shear bond strength (in megapascals) was analyzed with 2-factor ANOVA, separate single-factor ANOVA models for cure and material, and Tukey's Honestly Significant Differences multiple comparison procedure. All testing was performed at the 5% significance level (n=10).
Light-curing the adhesive separately produced significantly higher bond strengths to dentin (P <.001) than did the co-cure method. Group PRC did not produce significantly different bond strengths to enamel (P = .420).
Pre-curing of self-etching adhesives before curing of the resin composite produces greater bond strength to dentin. The curing technique has no significant effect on enamel bond strength of self-etching adhesives.
评估并比较3种自酸蚀粘结剂在树脂复合体应用前光固化或与树脂复合体共同固化时,对牙釉质和牙本质的剪切粘结强度。
120颗拔除的牙齿经湿磨后在牙釉质和牙本质上制备出平坦的粘结区域。根据制造商的说明,将3种粘结剂(Adper Prompt-L-Pop、Clearfil SE Bond和Xeno III)应用于牙本质或牙釉质。在一半的样本中,粘结剂应用后立即进行光固化(PRC组)。另一半样本在应用树脂复合体之前不进行光固化(COC组)。将树脂复合体放入聚四氟乙烯管中并在粘结剂上方进行光固化。样本在室温下于去离子水中储存24小时,然后用Instron测试机进行剪切加载直至破坏。用双因素方差分析、针对固化和材料的单独单因素方差分析模型以及Tukey's Honestly Significant Differences多重比较程序分析剪切粘结强度(以兆帕为单位)。所有测试均在5%显著性水平下进行(n = 10)。
与共同固化方法相比,单独对粘结剂进行光固化对牙本质产生的粘结强度显著更高(P <.001)。PRC组对牙釉质产生的粘结强度没有显著差异(P = 0.420)。
在树脂复合体固化之前对自酸蚀粘结剂进行预固化可对牙本质产生更大的粘结强度。固化技术对自酸蚀粘结剂的牙釉质粘结强度没有显著影响。