• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Gleason 4级和5级的比例可预测前列腺癌根治术后的生存率。

Percentage of Gleason pattern 4 and 5 predicts survival after radical prostatectomy.

作者信息

Cheng Liang, Davidson Darrell D, Lin Haiqun, Koch Michael O

机构信息

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2007 Nov 1;110(9):1967-72. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23004.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.23004
PMID:17823907
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Morphologic and clinical heterogeneity within tumor grades is well recognized in prostate cancer. The objective of the current study was to determine whether the combined percentage of Gleason patterns 4 and 5 in radical prostatectomy specimens is an independent predictor of cancer-specific survival in prostate cancer patients.

METHODS

The radical prostatectomy specimens were analyzed from 504 consecutive prostate cancer patients who were treated at Indiana University Medical Center between 1990 and 1998. Various clinical and pathologic characteristics were analyzed.

RESULTS

A higher combined percentage of Gleason patterns 4 and 5 was associated with older age, higher preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen level, higher pathologic stage, positive surgical margins, extraprostatic extension of tumor, higher Gleason score, perineural invasion, and lymph node metastasis. In the multivariate Cox regression model, the combined percentage of Gleason patterns 4 and 5 was found to be an independent predictor of cancer-specific survival (P = .04).

CONCLUSIONS

The combined percentage of Gleason patterns 4 and 5 is a powerful predictor of prostate cancer-specific survival. Assessment of high-grade cancer amounts may allow for better stratification of patients into appropriate prognostic groups and treatment protocols.

摘要

背景

前列腺癌中肿瘤分级内的形态学和临床异质性已得到充分认识。本研究的目的是确定根治性前列腺切除标本中Gleason 4级和5级模式的联合百分比是否是前列腺癌患者癌症特异性生存的独立预测因素。

方法

对1990年至1998年在印第安纳大学医学中心接受治疗的504例连续前列腺癌患者的根治性前列腺切除标本进行分析。分析了各种临床和病理特征。

结果

Gleason 4级和5级模式的联合百分比越高,与年龄越大、术前血清前列腺特异性抗原水平越高、病理分期越高、手术切缘阳性、肿瘤前列腺外侵犯、Gleason评分越高、神经周围侵犯和淋巴结转移相关。在多变量Cox回归模型中,发现Gleason 4级和5级模式的联合百分比是癌症特异性生存的独立预测因素(P = 0.04)。

结论

Gleason 4级和5级模式的联合百分比是前列腺癌特异性生存的有力预测因素。评估高级别癌的数量可能有助于将患者更好地分层到适当的预后组和治疗方案中。

相似文献

1
Percentage of Gleason pattern 4 and 5 predicts survival after radical prostatectomy.Gleason 4级和5级的比例可预测前列腺癌根治术后的生存率。
Cancer. 2007 Nov 1;110(9):1967-72. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23004.
2
Lymphovascular invasion is an independent prognostic factor in prostatic adenocarcinoma.淋巴管浸润是前列腺腺癌的一个独立预后因素。
J Urol. 2005 Dec;174(6):2181-5. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000181215.41607.c3.
3
The combined percentage of Gleason patterns 4 and 5 is the best predictor of cancer progression after radical prostatectomy.Gleason 4级和5级的综合百分比是前列腺癌根治术后癌症进展的最佳预测指标。
J Clin Oncol. 2005 May 1;23(13):2911-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.018.
4
Vascular invasion predicts recurrence after radical prostatectomy: stratification of risk based on pathologic variables.血管侵犯可预测根治性前列腺切除术后的复发:基于病理变量的风险分层
Urology. 2004 Oct;64(4):749-53. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2004.04.070.
5
Tertiary Gleason pattern 5 is a powerful predictor of biochemical relapse in patients with Gleason score 7 prostatic adenocarcinoma.三级Gleason评分5是Gleason评分7的前列腺腺癌患者生化复发的有力预测指标。
J Urol. 2006 May;175(5):1695-9; discussion 1699. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00998-5.
6
Positive-block ratio in radical prostatectomy specimens is an independent predictor of prostate-specific antigen recurrence.根治性前列腺切除术标本中的阳性阻断率是前列腺特异性抗原复发的独立预测指标。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2007 Jun;31(6):877-81. doi: 10.1097/01.pas.0000213429.61374.4f.
7
Prostate needle biopsies: multiple variables are predictive of final tumor volume in radical prostatectomy specimens.前列腺穿刺活检:多个变量可预测根治性前列腺切除术标本中的最终肿瘤体积。
Cancer. 2004 Aug 1;101(3):527-32. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20415.
8
The impact of discordance between biopsy and pathological Gleason scores on survival after radical prostatectomy.活检与病理Gleason评分不一致对根治性前列腺切除术后生存的影响。
J Urol. 2009 Jan;181(1):95-104; discussion 104. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.09.016. Epub 2008 Nov 13.
9
Prostate cancer disease-free survival after radical retropubic prostatectomy in patients older than 70 years compared to younger cohorts.70岁以上患者与年轻队列相比,耻骨后根治性前列腺切除术后的前列腺癌无病生存期。
Urol Oncol. 2007 Jul-Aug;25(4):291-7. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2006.08.001.
10
Visual estimation of tumour extent is not an independent predictor of prostate specific antigen recurrence.通过视觉评估肿瘤范围并非前列腺特异性抗原复发的独立预测指标。
BJU Int. 2005 Dec;96(9):1253-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2005.05825.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Prostate Cancer Recurrence Due to Isolated Testicular Metastases Detected by PSMA PET/CT.经PSMA PET/CT检测发现孤立性睾丸转移导致的前列腺癌复发
J Nucl Med. 2025 Jun 2;66(6):892-895. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.124.269361.
2
Histopathological Study of the Prostate Cancer Growth Patterns in Relation with the Grading Systems.前列腺癌生长模式与分级系统关系的组织病理学研究
Curr Health Sci J. 2022 Jan-Mar;48(1):95-101. doi: 10.12865/CHSJ.48.01.14. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
3
A transcriptomic signature for prostate cancer relapse prediction identified from the differentially expressed genes between TP53 mutant and wild-type tumors.
从 TP53 突变型和野生型肿瘤之间差异表达的基因中鉴定出用于前列腺癌复发预测的转录组学特征。
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 22;12(1):10561. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-14436-y.
4
Deciphering the Increased Prevalence of TP53 Mutations in Metastatic Prostate Cancer.解读转移性前列腺癌中TP53突变患病率增加的原因
Cancer Inform. 2022 Apr 2;21:11769351221087046. doi: 10.1177/11769351221087046. eCollection 2022.
5
Accuracy of fractal analysis and PI-RADS assessment of prostate magnetic resonance imaging for prediction of cancer grade groups: a clinical validation study.前列腺磁共振成像分形分析和 PI-RADS 评估对预测癌症分级组的准确性:一项临床验证研究。
Eur Radiol. 2022 Apr;32(4):2372-2383. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08358-y. Epub 2021 Dec 18.
6
Prediction of prostate cancer grade using fractal analysis of perfusion MRI: retrospective proof-of-principle study.基于灌注 MRI 的分形分析预测前列腺癌分级:回顾性原理验证研究。
Eur Radiol. 2022 May;32(5):3236-3247. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08394-8. Epub 2021 Dec 16.
7
Gene expression analysis reveals a pitfall in the molecular research of prostate tumors relevant to Gleason score.基因表达分析揭示了与格里森评分相关的前列腺肿瘤分子研究中的一个陷阱。
J Bioinform Comput Biol. 2020 Oct;18(5):2050032. doi: 10.1142/S0219720020500328. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
8
The 2019 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma.2019 年国际泌尿病理学会(ISUP)前列腺癌分级共识会议。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2020 Aug;44(8):e87-e99. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000001497.
9
SEER and Gene Expression Data Analysis Deciphers Racial Disparity Patterns in Prostate Cancer Mortality and the Public Health Implication.SEER 和基因表达数据分析揭示了前列腺癌死亡率中的种族差异模式及其公共卫生意义。
Sci Rep. 2020 Apr 22;10(1):6820. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63764-4.
10
Molecular Characterization and Clinical Outcomes of Primary Gleason Pattern 5 Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy.根治性前列腺切除术后原发性 Gleason 5 级前列腺癌的分子特征与临床结局
JCO Precis Oncol. 2019;3. doi: 10.1200/PO.19.00081. Epub 2019 Jul 26.