Suppr超能文献

对教学医院中病情不严重患者的应激性溃疡预防措施。

Stress ulcer prophylaxis for non-critically ill patients on a teaching service.

作者信息

Hwang Kevin O, Kolarov Sanja, Cheng Lee, Griffith Rebecca A

机构信息

Joint Primary Care Fellowship, Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, TX 77030, USA.

出版信息

J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Oct;13(5):716-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00742.x.

Abstract

RATIONALE

Doctors frequently give non-critically ill patients unjustified stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP). It is unknown if this practice also occurs during residency training.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the pattern of SUP given to non-critically ill medical patients on the teaching service of an internal medicine residency programme.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of non-critically ill adults admitted to the internal medicine teaching service of a community hospital from August 2003 to July 2004. We assessed receipt of SUP, association of SUP with risk factors for stress ulcer bleeding; appropriateness of SUP according to evidence-based criteria; and incidence of stress ulcer bleeding.

RESULTS

Of the 774 patient records reviewed, 545 were included in the study. The average age was 55.4 years. Patients were more likely to receive SUP if they had more risk factors for stress ulcer bleeding (P < 0.001). Overall, 54.9% (299 of 545) of patients received SUP. Of these 299 patients, at least 58.5% did not warrant SUP, depending on the criteria used. Of the entire cohort of 545 non-critically ill patients, 32.1% to 54.9% received unjustified SUP, depending on the criteria applied. There were no cases of stress ulcer bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Many non-critically ill patients on the teaching service received unjustified SUP, suggesting the need for institutional protocols and educational interventions to promote evidence-based practice during residency training.

摘要

理由

医生经常对非重症患者进行不合理的应激性溃疡预防(SUP)。目前尚不清楚这种做法在住院医师培训期间是否也会出现。

目的

评估在内科住院医师培训项目教学服务中,给予非重症内科患者SUP的模式。

方法

这是一项回顾性队列研究,研究对象为2003年8月至2004年7月入住社区医院内科教学服务的非重症成人患者。我们评估了SUP的接受情况、SUP与应激性溃疡出血风险因素的关联;根据循证标准判断SUP的合理性;以及应激性溃疡出血的发生率。

结果

在审查的774份患者记录中,有545份纳入研究。平均年龄为55.4岁。应激性溃疡出血风险因素越多的患者越有可能接受SUP(P<0.001)。总体而言,54.9%(545例中的299例)的患者接受了SUP。在这299例患者中,根据所使用的标准,至少58.5%的患者不需要进行SUP。在整个545例非重症患者队列中,根据所应用的标准,32.1%至54.9%的患者接受了不合理的SUP。没有应激性溃疡出血的病例。

结论

教学服务中的许多非重症患者接受了不合理的SUP,这表明需要制定机构方案和开展教育干预措施,以促进住院医师培训期间的循证实践。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验