Suppr超能文献

危重症患者发生胃肠道出血的危险因素。加拿大危重症试验组。

Risk factors for gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients. Canadian Critical Care Trials Group.

作者信息

Cook D J, Fuller H D, Guyatt G H, Marshall J C, Leasa D, Hall R, Winton T L, Rutledge F, Todd T J, Roy P

机构信息

Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ont., Canada.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 1994 Feb 10;330(6):377-81. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199402103300601.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of prophylaxis against stress ulcers in preventing gastrointestinal bleeding in critically ill patients has led to its widespread use. The side effects and cost of prophylaxis, however, necessitate targeting preventive therapy to those patients most likely to benefit.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective multicenter cohort study in which we evaluated potential risk factors for stress ulceration in patients admitted to intensive care units and documented the occurrence of clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding (defined as overt bleeding in association with hemodynamic compromise or the need for blood transfusion).

RESULTS

Of 2252 patients, 33 (1.5 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.0 to 2.1 percent) had clinically important bleeding. Two strong independent risk factors for bleeding were identified: respiratory failure (odds ratio, 15.6) and coagulopathy (odds ratio, 4.3). Of 847 patients who had one or both of these risk factors, 31 (3.7 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 2.5 to 5.2 percent) had clinically important bleeding. Of 1405 patients without these risk factors, 2 (0.1 percent; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.02 to 0.5 percent) had clinically important bleeding. The mortality rate was 48.5 percent in the group with bleeding and 9.1 percent in the group without bleeding (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Few critically ill patients have clinically important gastrointestinal bleeding, and therefore prophylaxis against stress ulcers can be safely withheld from critically ill patients unless they have coagulopathy or require mechanical ventilation.

摘要

背景

预防性使用应激性溃疡药物在预防重症患者胃肠道出血方面的疗效已使其得到广泛应用。然而,预防性用药的副作用和成本使得有必要将预防性治疗针对最可能受益的患者。

方法

我们进行了一项前瞻性多中心队列研究,评估入住重症监护病房患者发生应激性溃疡的潜在危险因素,并记录具有临床意义的胃肠道出血(定义为与血流动力学不稳定相关的显性出血或需要输血)的发生情况。

结果

在2252例患者中,33例(1.5%;95%置信区间为1.0%至2.1%)发生了具有临床意义的出血。确定了两个强烈的独立出血危险因素:呼吸衰竭(比值比为15.6)和凝血病(比值比为4.3)。在847例有其中一个或两个危险因素的患者中,31例(3.7%;95%置信区间为2.5%至5.2%)发生了具有临床意义的出血。在1405例无这些危险因素的患者中,2例(0.1%;95%置信区间为0.02%至0.5%)发生了具有临床意义的出血。出血组的死亡率为48.5%,无出血组为9.1%(P<0.001)。

结论

很少有重症患者发生具有临床意义的胃肠道出血,因此,除非重症患者有凝血病或需要机械通气,否则可以安全地不进行应激性溃疡的预防。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验