Suppr超能文献

医生如何实时运用信息?一项关于内科住院医师带教的定性研究。

How do doctors use information in real-time? A qualitative study of internal medicine resident precepting.

作者信息

Tilburt Jon C, Goold Susan D, Siddiqui Nazema, Mangrulkar Rajesh S

机构信息

Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1156, USA.

出版信息

J Eval Clin Pract. 2007 Oct;13(5):772-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2006.00752.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite the importance of evidence-based medicine in medical education, little observational research exists on how doctors-in-training seek and use evidence from information resources in ambulatory care.

OBJECTIVE

To describe information exchange behaviour by internal medicine residents and attendings in ambulatory resident clinic precepting rooms.

DESIGN

We observed resident behaviour and audiotaped resident-attending doctor interactions during precepting sessions.

PARTICIPANTS

Participating residents included 70 of an eligible 89 residents and 28 of 34 eligible attendings from one large academic internal medicine residency programme in the Midwestern USA. Residents were observed during 95 separate precepting interactions at four ambulatory sites.

APPROACH

Using a qualitative approach, we analysed transcripts and field notes of observed behaviours and interactions looking for themes of information exchange. Coders discussed themes which were refined using feedback from an interdisciplinary panel.

RESULTS

Four themes of information exchange behaviour emerged: (i) questioning behaviours that were used as part of the communication process in which the resident and attending doctor could reason together; (ii) searching behaviour of non-human knowledge sources occurred in a minority of precepting interations; (iii) unsolicited knowledge offering and (iv) answering behaviours were important means of exchanging information.

CONCLUSIONS

Most clinic interactions between resident and attending doctors relied heavily on spoken deliberation without resorting to the scientific literature or other published information resources. These observations suggest a range of factors that may moderate information exchange behaviour in the precepting context including relationships, space and efficiency. Future research should aim to more readily adapt information resources to the relationships and practice context of precepting.

摘要

背景

尽管循证医学在医学教育中很重要,但关于住院医师在门诊护理中如何从信息资源中寻找和使用证据的观察性研究却很少。

目的

描述内科住院医师和指导医师在门诊住院医师诊所带教室中的信息交流行为。

设计

我们在带教课程中观察了住院医师的行为,并对住院医师与指导医师的互动进行了录音。

参与者

参与研究的住院医师包括美国中西部一个大型学术内科住院医师项目中89名合格住院医师中的70名,以及34名合格指导医师中的28名。在四个门诊地点的95次单独带教互动中观察了住院医师。

方法

采用定性方法,我们分析了观察到的行为和互动的文字记录及现场笔记,以寻找信息交流的主题。编码人员讨论了这些主题,并根据跨学科小组的反馈进行了完善。

结果

出现了四个信息交流行为主题:(i)提问行为,作为住院医师和指导医师共同推理的交流过程的一部分;(ii)在少数带教互动中出现了对非人类知识来源的搜索行为;(iii)主动提供知识;(iv)回答行为是信息交流的重要方式。

结论

住院医师与指导医师之间的大多数临床互动严重依赖口头讨论,而不求助于科学文献或其他已发表的信息资源。这些观察结果表明,一系列因素可能会调节带教环境中的信息交流行为,包括人际关系、空间和效率。未来的研究应旨在使信息资源更容易适应带教的人际关系和实践环境。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验