• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性附睾疼痛附睾切除术后的长期随访

Long-term follow-up after epididymectomy for chronic epididymal pain.

作者信息

Siu Wendy, Ohl Dana A, Schuster Timothy G

机构信息

Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0330, USA.

出版信息

Urology. 2007 Aug;70(2):333-5; discussion 335-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.03.080.

DOI:10.1016/j.urology.2007.03.080
PMID:17826500
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Epididymectomy is an option for the relief of epididymal pain related to postoperative obstruction, epididymal cysts, or epididymitis. We performed 66 epididymectomies on 52 patients from 1996 to 2006 at our institution for localized epididymal pain. We evaluated the long-term symptomatic relief after epididymectomy.

METHODS

All 52 epididymectomy patients were mailed questionnaires regarding their current pain level and satisfaction. Patients who did not return the questionnaires were interviewed by telephone for follow-up.

RESULTS

Of the 52 patients, 34 returned 44 completed questionnaires (the patients with bilateral procedures were mailed a questionnaire for each side). The average age at epididymectomy was 44.2 years (range 25.0 to 67.9). The average follow-up was 45.8 months (range 4.2 to 119.3). Of the 34 procedures, 17 were left sided, 7 right sided, and 10 were bilateral; 25 had been performed for postvasectomy pain and 5 for obstruction related to hernia repair. Of the 44 cases, 31 (70%) reported no pain. Of the 13 still with pain, 8 (62%) reported less pain. Also, 90% were very satisfied or satisfied with their choice to undergo epididymectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

We found excellent results after epididymectomy, especially for the indication of postvasectomy pain.

摘要

目的

附睾切除术是缓解与术后梗阻、附睾囊肿或附睾炎相关的附睾疼痛的一种选择。1996年至2006年期间,我们在本机构为52例患者实施了66例附睾切除术,以治疗局限性附睾疼痛。我们评估了附睾切除术后的长期症状缓解情况。

方法

向所有52例接受附睾切除术的患者邮寄了有关其当前疼痛程度和满意度的问卷。未回复问卷的患者通过电话进行随访。

结果

52例患者中,34例返回了44份完整问卷(双侧手术的患者每侧都收到一份问卷)。附睾切除术时的平均年龄为44.2岁(范围25.0至67.9岁)。平均随访时间为45.8个月(范围4.2至119.3个月)。在34例手术中,17例为左侧,7例为右侧,10例为双侧;25例是因输精管切除术后疼痛而进行的,5例是因与疝气修补相关的梗阻而进行的。在44例病例中,31例(70%)报告无疼痛。在仍有疼痛的13例中,8例(62%)报告疼痛减轻。此外,90%的患者对选择接受附睾切除术非常满意或满意。

结论

我们发现附睾切除术后效果良好,尤其是对于输精管切除术后疼痛的适应症。

相似文献

1
Long-term follow-up after epididymectomy for chronic epididymal pain.慢性附睾疼痛附睾切除术后的长期随访
Urology. 2007 Aug;70(2):333-5; discussion 335-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.03.080.
2
Long-term outcome of epididymectomy for the management of chronic epididymal pain.附睾切除术治疗慢性附睾疼痛的长期疗效
J Urol. 2009 Oct;182(4):1407-12. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2009.06.020. Epub 2009 Aug 15.
3
Does surgery have a role in management of chronic intrascrotal pain?手术在慢性阴囊疼痛的治疗中起作用吗?
Urology. 2008 Jun;71(6):1099-102. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.02.036. Epub 2008 Apr 24.
4
Analyses of indications for and outcomes of epididymectomy.
J Urol. 1996 Jul;156(1):95-6.
5
Efficacy of epididymectomy in treatment of chronic epididymal pain: a comparison of patients with and without a history of vasectomy.附睾切除术治疗慢性附睾痛的疗效:有和无输精管结扎史患者的比较。
Urology. 2011 Jan;77(1):177-82. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2010.05.009. Epub 2010 Aug 14.
6
Epididymal sparing bilateral simple orchiectomy with epididymoplasty: preservation of esthetics and body image.保留附睾的双侧单纯睾丸切除术联合附睾成形术:保留美观和身体形象。
J Urol. 2005 Sep;174(3):893-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000172567.09442.b0.
7
Chronic epididymitis: is epididymectomy a valid surgical treatment?慢性附睾炎:附睾切除术是一种有效的外科治疗方法吗?
Int J Androl. 2009 Oct;32(5):468-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2008.00880.x. Epub 2008 Mar 31.
8
Epididymectomy is an effective treatment for scrotal pain after vasectomy.附睾切除术是治疗输精管结扎术后阴囊疼痛的有效方法。
BJU Int. 2000 Jun;85(9):1097-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2000.00656.x.
9
Fluoroscopic percutaneous lumbar zygapophyseal joint cyst rupture: a clinical outcome study.透视引导下经皮腰椎关节突关节囊肿破裂:一项临床疗效研究。
Spine J. 2009 May;9(5):387-95. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2008.08.008. Epub 2008 Sep 21.
10
The morbidity of an anterior thoracolumbar approach: adult spinal deformity patients with greater than five-year follow-up.前路胸腰段手术的发病率:随访超过五年的成人脊柱畸形患者
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Apr 15;34(8):822-6. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31818e3157.

引用本文的文献

1
Current trends and therapies in orchialgia management.睾丸疼痛管理的当前趋势与治疗方法
Ther Adv Urol. 2021 Jun 22;13:17562872211026433. doi: 10.1177/17562872211026433. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
2
Evaluation and Management of Chronic Scrotal Content Pain-A Common Yet Poorly Understood Condition.慢性阴囊内容物疼痛的评估与管理——一种常见但了解不足的病症
Rev Urol. 2019;21(2-3):74-84.
3
Vasectomy: tips and tricks.输精管切除术:技巧与窍门。
Transl Androl Urol. 2017 Aug;6(4):704-709. doi: 10.21037/tau.2017.07.08.
4
Evaluation and management of chronic scrotal content pain.慢性阴囊内容物疼痛的评估与管理
Curr Urol Rep. 2015 Jun;16(6):36. doi: 10.1007/s11934-015-0510-1.
5
Scrotal pain: evaluation and management.阴囊疼痛:评估与处理
Korean J Urol. 2015 Jan;56(1):3-11. doi: 10.4111/kju.2015.56.1.3. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
6
A comparison of epididymectomy with vasectomy reversal for the surgical treatment of postvasectomy pain syndrome.附睾切除术与输精管复通术治疗输精管结扎术后疼痛综合征的手术疗效比较。
Int Urol Nephrol. 2014 Mar;46(3):531-7. doi: 10.1007/s11255-013-0517-9. Epub 2013 Sep 21.
7
Chronic orchialgia: evaluation and discussion of treatment options.慢性睾丸痛:评估与治疗选择探讨。
Ther Adv Urol. 2010 Oct;2(5-06):209-14. doi: 10.1177/1756287210390409.