Niepraschk Markus, Rahiotis Christos, Bradley T Gerard, Eliades Theodore, Eliades George
Department of Developmental Sciences, Marquette University School of Dentistry, Milwaukee, Wis 53233, USA.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Sep;132(3):382-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.04.029.
The purpose of this study was to compare the percentage degree of cure (%DC) of orthodontic adhesive resins irradiated with 3 types of light sources of various intensities: plasma arc, halogen, and light-emitting diode (LED).
Twenty maxillary incisor stainless steel brackets (0.018-in slot) were divided into 4 groups of 5 brackets each. A standardized amount of composite resin was applied to each bracket base, simulating its clinical application. The brackets were light-cured with a halogen light for 20 seconds (10 seconds each from the incisal and cervical bracket edges), an LED light for 20 seconds (10 seconds per edge), a plasma light for 10 seconds (5 seconds per edge), and an LED light for 10 seconds (5 seconds per edge). The %DC was assessed by using micro-multiple internal reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and the results were analyzed with 1-way ANOVA.
Overall, the LED and the halogen lights, with the 20-second regimen, produced higher %DC. No significant difference was found in %DC between the plasma light and the 10-second LED light, whereas both showed lower %DC compared with 20 seconds of halogen or LED light.
Significant variations in %DC are associated with the various light-curing units, which must be considered in selecting the light source and the irradiation time.
本研究的目的是比较用三种不同强度光源(等离子弧、卤素灯和发光二极管(LED))照射的正畸粘结树脂的固化百分率(%DC)。
将20个上颌切牙不锈钢托槽(0.018英寸槽沟)分成4组,每组5个托槽。向每个托槽基底涂抹标准化量的复合树脂,模拟其临床应用。托槽分别用卤素灯照射20秒(从托槽切端和龈端边缘各照射10秒)、LED灯照射20秒(每端照射10秒)、等离子灯照射10秒(每端照射5秒)以及LED灯照射10秒(每端照射5秒)进行光固化。使用显微多重内反射傅里叶变换红外光谱法评估%DC,并采用单因素方差分析对结果进行分析。
总体而言,采用20秒照射方案时,LED灯和卤素灯产生的%DC更高。等离子灯和10秒照射时间的LED灯之间在%DC上未发现显著差异,而与20秒照射时间的卤素灯或LED灯相比,二者的%DC均较低。
%DC存在显著差异与不同的光固化设备有关,在选择光源和照射时间时必须予以考虑。