Suppr超能文献

[泌尿外科膀胱镜再处理。2005/2006年德国美因河畔法兰克福医院及私人诊所的指南遵循情况]

[Reprocessing cystoscopes in urology. Guideline compliance in hospitals and private practices in Frankfurt/M, Germany in 2005/2006].

作者信息

Heudorf U, Otto U

机构信息

Abteilung Medizinische Dienste und Hygiene, Stadtgesundheitsamt, Frankfurt am Main, BRD.

出版信息

Bundesgesundheitsblatt Gesundheitsforschung Gesundheitsschutz. 2007 Sep;50(9):1138-44. doi: 10.1007/s00103-007-0314-7.

Abstract

After having been informed about current guidelines, all urologic units in hospitals and private practices in Frankfurt/Main were visited in 2005/6 by members of the public health department and assessed using a checklist based on the recommendations of the German Guidelines for reprocessing medical instruments including rigid and flexible cystoscopes. In 12 hospitals and 22 private practices cystoscopy was performed using rigid cystoscopes, whereas flexible cystoscopes were used in 7 hospitals and 8 private practices. Cystoscopy with flexible instruments was more common in ambulatory than in clinic settings (about 1150/year vs. 280/year). In hospitals, reprocessing of the rigid cystoscopes was performed in special units for reprocessing (disinfection, sterilisation) using validated automatic processes, whereas reprocessing of flexible cystoscopes often was performed in the urologic units themselves, and not always in a correct manner. In the private practices, mainly manual reprocessing procedures were in use for rigid cystoscopes, in 18 out of 22 practices correct. However, only in 50 % of the private practices, sterilisation equipment was available for reprocessing rigid cystoscopes and/or endoscopic accessories. Flexible cystoscopes were reprocessed using a washer-disinfector in one practice, in the other ones, manual reprocessing was performed. In two practices only, reprocessing according to the guidelines was seen. Infection control advice and repeated control of the public health department resulted in the correction of most processing faults within some months.

摘要

在了解了当前指南后,2005/2006年,法兰克福市公共卫生部门的工作人员走访了法兰克福/美因河畔所有医院的泌尿外科以及私人诊所,并根据德国医疗器械再处理指南(包括硬性和软性膀胱镜)的建议使用检查表进行了评估。12家医院和22家私人诊所使用硬性膀胱镜进行膀胱镜检查,7家医院和8家私人诊所使用软性膀胱镜。软性器械膀胱镜检查在门诊比在临床环境中更常见(约每年1150例 vs. 每年280例)。在医院,硬性膀胱镜的再处理在专门的再处理单元(消毒、灭菌)中使用经过验证的自动化流程进行,而软性膀胱镜的再处理通常在泌尿外科本身进行,且并非总是以正确的方式进行。在私人诊所,硬性膀胱镜主要采用手工再处理程序,22家诊所中有18家操作正确。然而,只有50%的私人诊所有用于再处理硬性膀胱镜和/或内镜附件的灭菌设备。一家私人诊所使用清洗消毒器对软性膀胱镜进行再处理,其他诊所则进行手工再处理。只有两家诊所按照指南进行再处理。感染控制建议和公共卫生部门的反复检查导致大多数处理错误在几个月内得到纠正。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验