Suppr超能文献

[复杂创伤后应激障碍的评估——一种诊断访谈的内部和外部效度]

[Assessment of complex PTSD - internal and external validity of a diagnostic interview].

作者信息

Boroske-Leiner Katja, Hofmann Arne, Sack Martin

机构信息

Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU München, Klinik und Poliklinik für Psychosomatische Medizin und Psychotherapie.

出版信息

Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2008 May;58(5):192-9. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-971011. Epub 2007 Sep 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The diagnostic construct of complex posttraumatic stress disorder (complex PTSD) describes the consequences of early onset and long-term persisting psychological traumatizations. The interview for complex PTSD (I-kPTBS) - is the German adaptation of the structured interview for disorders of extreme stress (SIDES). The present study reports first data regarding the internal validity of the I-kPTBS as well as on the external validity of the diagnosis of complex PTSD.

METHOD

The I-kPTBS was applied in 72 consecutive patients of a specialized outpatient clinic. 31 patients fulfilled the criteria of the diagnosis complex PTSD. 25 suffered from a PTSD but did not fulfil the diagnostic criteria of complex PTSD. Both groups where compared regarding their symptoms, resources and reports of childhood events.

RESULTS

Internal consistence of the I-kPTBS regarding the sample was good to excellent (alpha = 0.88). As expected, patients with the diagnosis of complex PTSD showed more severe dissociative, depressive and general anxiety symptoms than patients with PTSD alone. Patients fulfilling the criteria of complex PTSD reported a lower age at their first traumatic event, more multiple traumatizations and more often a dissociative disorder as comorbid diagnosis. Patients with complex PTSD show a higher traumaload in childhood and a lower level of compensatory resources.

DISCUSSION

The interview for complex PTSD (I-kPTBS) describes a consistent diagnostic construct. The results demonstrate that the diagnosis of complex PTSD selects a specific group of patients with early childhood trauma and high symptom level. Specific criteria can differentiate this patient group well from patients that suffer from PTSD alone.

摘要

背景

复杂创伤后应激障碍(complex PTSD)的诊断结构描述了早期发病和长期持续心理创伤的后果。复杂创伤后应激障碍访谈(I-kPTBS)——是德国对极端应激障碍结构化访谈(SIDES)的改编版。本研究报告了关于I-kPTBS内部效度以及复杂创伤后应激障碍诊断外部效度的首批数据。

方法

I-kPTBS应用于一家专门门诊连续收治的72例患者。31例患者符合复杂创伤后应激障碍的诊断标准。25例患有创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)但不符合复杂创伤后应激障碍的诊断标准。对两组患者的症状、资源和童年事件报告进行了比较。

结果

I-kPTBS在该样本中的内部一致性良好至优秀(α = 0.88)。正如预期的那样,诊断为复杂创伤后应激障碍的患者比仅患有创伤后应激障碍的患者表现出更严重的分离性、抑郁性和广泛性焦虑症状。符合复杂创伤后应激障碍标准的患者报告首次创伤事件发生时年龄更小、遭受更多次创伤,且更常伴有分离性障碍作为共病诊断。复杂创伤后应激障碍患者童年期的创伤负荷更高,补偿资源水平更低。

讨论

复杂创伤后应激障碍访谈(I-kPTBS)描述了一个一致的诊断结构。结果表明,复杂创伤后应激障碍的诊断筛选出了一组童年期有创伤且症状水平高的特定患者群体。特定标准能够很好地将该患者群体与仅患有创伤后应激障碍的患者区分开来。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验