Oliver C M, Abbott P V
Division of Restorative Dentistry, Dental School, University of Western Australia, Perth.
Endod Dent Traumatol. 1991 Jun;7(3):135-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-9657.1991.tb00198.x.
This study was conducted to determine the effect of entrapped air on the ability of methylene blue dye to penetrate known and measurable voids. Thirty six capillary tubes were sealed at one end and had standardized voids created within the lumen. Three equal groups of 12 test specimens and 4 controls were subjected to dye penetration by the methods of passive immersion for 7 days, centrifuging at 3,000 rpm for 5 minutes and immersion in a vacuum of 26 mm of mercury for 5 minutes. Measurement of linear dye penetration was made by removing shavings from the sealed end until dye could be observed. Negative controls showed no dye penetration and positive controls showed complete penetration. The vacuum method showed 100% penetration in all cases, while centrifuging had a mean of 91.7 /+ 8.7% penetration and passive immersion had a mean of 20.7 +/- 5.4% penetration. This study demonstrates that passive dye leakage studies are unreliable and very variable. The vacuum method whereby all entrapped air is removed is the most reliable method for dye penetration studies.
本研究旨在确定截留空气对亚甲蓝染料渗透已知且可测量空隙能力的影响。36根毛细管一端密封,管腔内形成标准化空隙。将三组各12个测试样本和4个对照样本分为相等的三组,通过被动浸泡7天、以3000转/分钟离心5分钟以及在26毫米汞柱真空下浸泡5分钟的方法进行染料渗透实验。通过从密封端去除刨屑直至观察到染料来测量染料的线性渗透。阴性对照未显示染料渗透,阳性对照显示完全渗透。真空法在所有情况下均显示100%渗透,而离心法的平均渗透率为91.7%±8.7%,被动浸泡法的平均渗透率为20.7%±5.4%。本研究表明,被动染料渗漏研究不可靠且变化很大。去除所有截留空气的真空法是染料渗透研究最可靠的方法。