Beaver R W, James M A, Lin T Y
University of Georgia, Department of Plant Pathology, Tifton 31793.
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1991 Sep-Oct;74(5):827-9.
An enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) screening test (CITE PROBE) was compared to liquid chromatography (LC) for the determination of aflatoxins in naturally contaminated corn samples. The CITE PROBE, with a positive/negative cutoff of 5 ng/g aflatoxin B1, was correct (based on LC results) on 47 of 51 samples. Two of the incorrect responses by the CITE PROBE were false positives on samples containing 4.4 ng/g and 4.1 ng/g aflatoxins by LC. Another incorrect response was a false negative on a sample containing 5.5 ng/g aflatoxins by LC. The fourth incorrect response was a false positive on a sample containing 1.9 ng/g aflatoxins by LC. On the basis of these results, the CITE PROBE was determined to be a reliable screening method for the detection of greater than or equal to 5 ng/g aflatoxins in corn.
将酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)筛选试验(CITE PROBE)与液相色谱法(LC)进行比较,以测定天然污染玉米样品中的黄曲霉毒素。CITE PROBE的黄曲霉毒素B1阳性/阴性临界值为5 ng/g,在51个样品中的47个上(基于LC结果)判断正确。CITE PROBE的两个错误判断是,对于LC测定黄曲霉毒素含量分别为4.4 ng/g和4.1 ng/g的样品出现假阳性。另一个错误判断是,对于LC测定黄曲霉毒素含量为5.5 ng/g的样品出现假阴性。第四个错误判断是,对于LC测定黄曲霉毒素含量为1.9 ng/g的样品出现假阳性。基于这些结果,确定CITE PROBE是检测玉米中黄曲霉毒素含量大于或等于5 ng/g的可靠筛选方法。