Dorner J W, Cole R J
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Peanut Research Laboratory, Dawson, GA 31742.
J Assoc Off Anal Chem. 1989 Nov-Dec;72(6):962-4.
A study was conducted to evaluate the performance of 2 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISA) for rapidly screening samples of peanuts for the presence of aflatoxin. The EZ-Screen Quick Card Test and the Afla-10 Cup Test were compared with liquid chromatography in duplicate analyses of common extracts of peanuts contaminated in the range of 0-70 ppb (ng/g). Each assay properly identified 95% of samples containing no detectable aflatoxin as negative and greater than 97% of samples containing greater than 10 ppb aflatoxin as positive. The card test, which had a 20 ppb detection threshold, identified as positive 32 of 34 samples in the 11-20 ppb range. This indicates that the card test might actually have a detection threshold closer to 10 ppb. Most of the errors associated with the assays occurred on samples containing less than 10 ppb aflatoxin. The cup and card tests identified 76 and 67% of the samples, respectively, as negative, in the range of 4-10 ppb. For samples either negative or contaminated above their detection thresholds for the assays, the methods are well suited for use as rapid screening tests.
开展了一项研究,以评估两种酶联免疫吸附测定法(ELISA)在快速筛查花生样本中黄曲霉毒素存在情况方面的性能。在对污染程度为0至70 ppb(纳克/克)的花生常见提取物进行的重复分析中,将EZ-Screen快速卡片检测法和Afla-10杯式检测法与液相色谱法进行了比较。每种检测法都能正确地将95%未检测到黄曲霉毒素的样本鉴定为阴性,将97%以上黄曲霉毒素含量大于10 ppb的样本鉴定为阳性。卡片检测法的检测阈值为20 ppb,在11至20 ppb范围内的34个样本中有32个被鉴定为阳性。这表明卡片检测法的实际检测阈值可能更接近10 ppb。与这些检测法相关的大多数误差出现在黄曲霉毒素含量低于10 ppb的样本上。在4至10 ppb范围内,杯式检测法和卡片检测法分别将76%和67%的样本鉴定为阴性。对于检测法检测结果为阴性或高于其检测阈值的污染样本,这些方法非常适合用作快速筛查检测。