Olatunji Bunmi O, Williams Nathan L, Tolin David F, Abramowitz Jonathan S, Sawchuk Craig N, Lohr Jeffrey M, Elwood Lisa S
Department of Psychology, Vanderbilt University, 111 21st Avenue South, Nashville, TN 37203, USA.
Psychol Assess. 2007 Sep;19(3):281-97. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.19.3.281.
In the 4 studies presented (N = 1,939), a converging set of analyses was conducted to evaluate the item adequacy, factor structure, reliability, and validity of the Disgust Scale (DS; J. Haidt, C. McCauley, & P. Rozin, 1994). The results suggest that 7 items (i.e., Items 2, 7, 8, 21, 23, 24, and 25) should be considered for removal from the DS. Secondary to removing the items, exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses revealed that the DS taps 3 dimensions of disgust: Core Disgust, Animal Reminder Disgust, and Contamination-Based Disgust. Women scored higher than men on the 3 disgust dimensions. Structural modeling provided support for the specificity of the 3-factor model, as Core Disgust and Contamination-Based Disgust were significantly predictive of obsessive- compulsive disorder (OCD) concerns, whereas Animal Reminder Disgust was not. Results from a clinical sample indicated that patients with OCD washing concerns scored significantly higher than patients with OCD without washing concerns on both Core Disgust and Contamination-Based Disgust, but not on Animal Reminder Disgust. These findings are discussed in the context of the refinement of the DS to promote a more psychometrically sound assessment of disgust sensitivity.
在呈现的4项研究(N = 1939)中,进行了一系列综合分析,以评估厌恶量表(DS;J. 海德特、C. 麦考利和P. 罗津,1994)的项目适宜性、因子结构、信度和效度。结果表明,应考虑从DS中删除7个项目(即项目2、7、8、21、23、24和25)。在删除这些项目之后,探索性和验证性因子分析表明,DS涵盖了厌恶的3个维度:核心厌恶、动物提醒厌恶和基于污染的厌恶。女性在这3个厌恶维度上的得分高于男性。结构模型为三因子模型的特异性提供了支持,因为核心厌恶和基于污染的厌恶显著预测了强迫症(OCD)相关问题,而动物提醒厌恶则不然。临床样本的结果表明,有强迫洗涤问题的强迫症患者在核心厌恶和基于污染的厌恶方面的得分显著高于无强迫洗涤问题的强迫症患者,但在动物提醒厌恶方面则不然。这些发现是在对DS进行完善的背景下进行讨论的,以促进对厌恶敏感性进行更具心理测量学意义的评估。