Carr Catherine, Hollinger F Blaine, Yoffe Boris, Wakil Adil, Phillips Jason, Bzowej Natalie, Leung Janet, Mirro Katherine, Poordad Fred, Moore Dan H, Gish Robert G
Departments of Medicine and Transplantation, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Liver Int. 2007 Oct;27(8):1111-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-3231.2007.01535.x.
BACKGROUND/AIMS: Chronic hepatitis C (HCV) patients who have failed previous treatment have low sustained viral response (SVR) rates with repeat treatment. We evaluated whether interferon (IFN) induction during retreatment improves response rates.
Two randomized, controlled trials were conducted in chronic HCV patients who failed IFN. In Study 1, patients received IFN 3 MU daily plus ribavirin (RBV) 1000 mg/day for 4 weeks, followed by IFN 3 MU TIW plus RBV 1000 mg/day for 44 weeks (induction; n=232), or IFN 3 MU TIW plus RBV 1000 mg/day for 48 weeks (non-induction; n=237). In Study 2, patients received IFN 5 MU B.I.D. plus RBV 1000-1200 mg/day for 2 weeks, followed by pegylated IFN (PEG-IFN) 75-150 mug weekly plus RBV 1000-1200 mg/day for 46 weeks (induction; n=201), or PEG-IFN 75-150 mug weekly plus RBV 1000-1200 mg/day for 48 weeks (non-induction; n=206). The primary end point for both trials was SVR.
Induction did not increase SVR compared with non-induction, but did increase the on-treatment response among genotype non-1 patients in Study 2. By intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, SVR in Study 1 was 13% for induction vs. 9% for non-induction (P=NS). In Study 2 (ITT), SVR was 20% for induction vs. 24% for non-induction (P=NS). However, by non-ITT analysis of Study 2, genotype non-1-previous non-responders showed significantly higher response rates with induction than non-induction.
For chronic HCV patients who have failed IFN, induction with retreatment does not improve SVR, but may be beneficial for patients with genotype non-1 HCV.
背景/目的:既往治疗失败的慢性丙型肝炎(HCV)患者再次治疗时持续病毒学应答(SVR)率较低。我们评估了再次治疗期间干扰素(IFN)诱导是否能提高应答率。
对IFN治疗失败的慢性HCV患者进行了两项随机对照试验。在研究1中,患者先接受每日3MU IFN加1000mg/天利巴韦林(RBV)治疗4周,然后接受每周3次、每次3MU IFN加1000mg/天RBV治疗44周(诱导组;n = 232),或每周3次、每次3MU IFN加1000mg/天RBV治疗48周(非诱导组;n = 237)。在研究2中,患者先接受每日2次、每次5MU IFN加1000 - 1200mg/天RBV治疗2周,然后接受每周75 - 150μg聚乙二醇干扰素(PEG - IFN)加1000 - 1200mg/天RBV治疗46周(诱导组;n = 201),或每周75 - 150μg PEG - IFN加1000 - 1200mg/天RBV治疗48周(非诱导组;n = 206)。两项试验的主要终点均为SVR。
与非诱导组相比,诱导组并未提高SVR,但在研究2中确实提高了基因1型以外患者的治疗期应答率。按意向性治疗(ITT)分析,研究1中诱导组的SVR为13%,非诱导组为9%(P = 无显著性差异)。在研究2(ITT)中,诱导组的SVR为20%,非诱导组为24%(P = 无显著性差异)。然而,通过对研究2的非ITT分析,基因1型以外既往无应答者中,诱导组的应答率显著高于非诱导组。
对于IFN治疗失败的慢性HCV患者,再次治疗时进行诱导并不能提高SVR,但可能对基因1型以外的HCV患者有益。