Suppr超能文献

连续心输出量测量:体外循环心脏手术期间动脉压分析与热稀释技术的比较

Continuous cardiac output measurement: arterial pressure analysis versus thermodilution technique during cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass.

作者信息

Lorsomradee S, Lorsomradee S R, Cromheecke S, De Hert S G

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesia, Chiangmai University Hospital, Thailand.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 2007 Oct;62(10):979-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05194.x.

Abstract

This study compared cardiac output measured with an arterial pressure-based cardiac output measurement system and a thermodilution cardiac output measurement system. We studied 36 patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. Simultaneous arterial pressure-based and thermodilution cardiac output measurements were compared before and after cardiopulmonary bypass, and after phenylephrine administration. Bland-Altman analysis showed good overall agreement between the two methods. Bias (limits of agreement) before and after cardiopulmonary bypass were - 0.21 (- 2.97-2.55) lxmin(-1) and 0.01 (- 3.79-3.81) lxmin(-1), respectively. Phenylephrine administration decreased thermodilution cardiac output by a mean (SD) of 11 (16)% and increased arterial pressure-based cardiac output by 55 (34)%. We conclude that arterial pressure-based cardiac output and thermodilution cardiac output measurement systems yield comparable results during cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. However, after phenylephrine administration, the two measurement systems provided opposing results.

摘要

本研究比较了基于动脉压的心输出量测量系统和热稀释法心输出量测量系统所测得的心输出量。我们研究了36例接受体外循环心脏手术的患者。在体外循环前后以及给予去氧肾上腺素后,对基于动脉压和热稀释法的心输出量测量结果进行了同步比较。Bland-Altman分析显示两种方法总体一致性良好。体外循环前后的偏差(一致性界限)分别为-0.21(-2.97至2.55)升/分钟和0.01(-3.79至3.81)升/分钟。给予去氧肾上腺素使热稀释法测得的心输出量平均(标准差)降低了11(16)%,而基于动脉压的心输出量增加了55(34)%。我们得出结论,在体外循环心脏手术期间,基于动脉压的心输出量测量系统和热稀释法心输出量测量系统得出的结果具有可比性。然而,给予去氧肾上腺素后,两种测量系统给出了相反的结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验