Lapane Kate L, Quilliam Brian J, Hughes Carmel M
Department of Community Health, Brown Medical School, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2007 Sep;8(7):446-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2007.04.007. Epub 2007 Aug 13.
Survey research focusing on patient safety issues in the nursing home sector poses challenges owing to nursing staff turnover rates, and the adversarial and punitive nature of US nursing home regulation which may promote a negative culture of distrust. Using a patient safety questionnaire, we compared two methods of survey distribution on response rates, respondent sample characteristics, and resident safety ratings. We hypothesized that employees may provide overly positive perceptions when the surveys are distributed on-site as opposed to distribution to employees' homes, as has been reported by studies evaluating patient satisfaction in other settings.
In August 2003, 26 nursing homes indicated their distribution method preference (mail directly to staff members' homes vs. distributed at work) for a survey determining perceptions of resident safety. Facilities provided lists of currently employed nurses (n=721) and nursing assistants (n=1,233). The survey process included an initial mailing of the survey packet, a reminder postcard, a re-mail of the survey packet to non-respondents to the initial survey, and a final reminder postcard. Return envelopes were addressed to the research team.
In nursing facilities where surveys were distributed at work, a greater proportion of respondents were identified as no longer currently employed. Response rates were similar regardless of distribution method, but with greater variability in the facility-specific response rate in surveys distributed at work. Regardless of staffing type, yield of the first mailing was lower and yield of the second mailing higher in homes with surveys distributed at work than those mailed directly to respondents' homes. While characteristics of nurses were similar regardless of wave, nursing assistant responders to second mailing were more likely to be black relative to responders to the first wave.
Distributing surveys at the workplace may not result in a reduction of response rate, but may provide overly positive perceptions of patient safety issues. Mailing directly to homes may result in less facility-level variability in response rates. Multiple mailings may increase the diversity of the respondent pool.
由于护理人员的流动率,以及美国疗养院监管的对抗性和惩罚性本质(这可能助长一种负面的不信任文化),聚焦疗养院领域患者安全问题的调查研究面临挑战。我们使用一份患者安全调查问卷,比较了两种调查分发方式在回复率、受访者样本特征和居民安全评级方面的差异。我们假设,与在其他环境中评估患者满意度的研究报告的情况一样,当调查问卷在现场分发而非分发给员工家中时,员工可能会给出过于积极的看法。
2003年8月,26家疗养院表明了它们对于一项确定居民安全认知的调查的分发方式偏好(直接邮寄到工作人员家中与在工作场所分发)。各机构提供了当前在职护士(n = 721)和护理助理(n = 1233)的名单。调查过程包括首次邮寄调查问卷包、一张提醒明信片、将调查问卷包重新邮寄给未回复首次调查的对象,以及最后一张提醒明信片。回邮信封的收件人为研究团队。
在工作场所分发调查问卷的护理机构中,更大比例的受访者被确定为已不再在职。无论分发方式如何,回复率相似,但在工作场所分发的调查问卷中,各机构特定的回复率差异更大。无论人员类型如何,在工作场所分发调查问卷的家庭中,首次邮寄的回收率较低,第二次邮寄的回收率较高,而直接邮寄给受访者家中的情况则相反。无论调查轮次如何,护士的特征相似,但相对于第一轮的受访者,第二轮邮寄的护理助理受访者更有可能是黑人。
在工作场所分发调查问卷可能不会降低回复率,但可能会对患者安全问题给出过于积极的看法。直接邮寄到家中可能会使各机构层面的回复率差异较小。多次邮寄可能会增加受访者群体的多样性。