Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
J Patient Saf. 2012 Sep;8(3):104-24. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0b013e31824badce.
Although nursing homes provide complex care requiring attention to safety, research on safety climate in nursing homes is limited. Our study assessed differences in attitudes about safety among nursing home personnel and piloted a new survey, specifically designed for the nursing home context.
Drawing on previous safety climate surveys for hospitals and nursing homes, researchers developed the Survey on Resident Safety in Nursing Homes and administered it March to June 2008 to frontline caregivers and managers in 8 randomly selected Massachusetts nursing homes. Our sample consisted of 751 employees, including all full-time, direct-care staff and managers from participating facilities. First, we performed factor analysis and determined Cronbach alphas for the Survey on Resident Safety in Nursing Homes. Then, we described facilities' safety climate and variation by personnel category and among facilities by calculating the proportion of responses that were strongly positive by item, personnel category, and nursing home.
Of 432 respondents (57% response), 29% gave their nursing home an excellent rating overall. Scores varied by personnel category and home: 51% of senior managers gave an excellent safety grade versus 26% of nursing assistants; the range in top safety grades among nursing homes was 30 percentage points.
Safety climate varied substantially among this small sample of nursing homes and by personnel category; managers had more positive perceptions about safety than frontline workers. Efforts to measure safety climate in nursing homes should include the full range of staff at a facility and comparisons among staff categories to provide a full understanding for decision making and to promote targeted response to improve resident safety.
尽管养老院提供需要注重安全的复杂护理,但有关养老院安全氛围的研究却很有限。我们的研究评估了养老院工作人员对安全问题的态度差异,并试用了一种专门针对养老院环境设计的新调查。
研究人员借鉴了先前针对医院和养老院的安全氛围调查,制定了《养老院居民安全调查》,并于 2008 年 3 月至 6 月在马萨诸塞州的 8 家随机选定的养老院的一线护理人员和管理人员中进行了调查。我们的样本包括 751 名员工,包括所有全职直接护理人员和参与设施的管理人员。首先,我们进行了因素分析,并确定了《养老院居民安全调查》的 Cronbach 阿尔法值。然后,我们根据人员类别和设施,通过计算按项目、人员类别和养老院划分的强烈赞成比例,描述了设施的安全氛围和变化。
在 432 名受访者(57%的回应率)中,29%的人对他们的养老院整体评价为优秀。评分因人员类别和养老院而异:51%的高级管理人员给予安全等级优秀,而 26%的护理助理给予;养老院的安全等级最高评分相差 30 个百分点。
在这个小样本的养老院和人员类别中,安全氛围差异很大;管理人员对安全的看法比一线工作人员更为积极。在养老院中衡量安全氛围的努力应包括设施中的所有员工,并对员工类别进行比较,以全面了解决策情况,并促进有针对性的措施来提高居民的安全。